Sodar measurements of wing vortex strength and position

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 141-155

  Bradley, Stuart ^a   Mursch Radlgruber, Erich ^b   von Hünerbein, Sabine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REAL TIME CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS; VORTEX FLOW;

SODAR MEASUREMENTS; VORTEX MEASUREMENTS; WING VORTEX;

WINGS;

AERODYNAMICS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REAL TIME CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS; VORTEX FLOW; WINGS;

AIRCRAFT; MEASUREMENT METHOD; POTENTIAL FLOW; REAL TIME; SODAR; VISUALIZATION; VORTEX; VORTEX FLOW;

EID: 33847748194     PISSN: 07390572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1966.1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, J. D., 2001: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. 3d ed. McGraw-Hill, 772 pp.
2. Barker, B. C., D. C. Burnham, and R. P. Rudis, 1997: Wake sensor evaluation program and results of JFK-1 wake vortex sensor intercomparisons. Proc. NASA First Wake Vortex Dynamic Spacing Workshop, Hampton, VA, NASA, 324-332.
3. Bradley, S. G., S. von Hünerbein, and K. H. Underwood, 2006: Operational reliability and accuracy of sodars in wing vortex characterization. Extended Abstracts, 12th Conf. on Aviation Range and Aerospace Meteorology, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, P5.11.
4. Burnham, D. C., 1997: Ground-based wake vortex sensor technology: Current capabilities, future prospects. Proc. Int. Wake Vortex Meeting, TP 13166, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Transport Canada, 107-108.
5. Burnham, D. C., and J. N. Hallock, 1982: Chicago Monostatic Acoustic Vortex Sensing System. Vol. IV, Wake Vortex Decay, DOT Transportation Systems Center.
6. Burnham, D. C., and R. P. Rudis, 1997: JFK-1 wake vortex sensor intercomparisons. 1st NASA Wake Vortex Dynamic Spacing Workshop, L. Credeur and R. Perry, Eds., NASA Langley Research Center, NASA/ CP-97-206235, 333-341.
7. Corjon, A., and T. Poinsot, 1996: Vortex model to define safe separation distances. J. Aircr., 33, 547-553.
8. Corjon, A., and T. Poinsot, 1997: Behaviour of wake vortices near ground. AIAA J., 35, 849-855.
9. Coustols, E., L. Jacquin, F. Moens, and P. Molton, 2004: Status of ONERA research on wake vortex in the framework of National Activities and European Collaboration. Proc. ECCOMAS 2004, Jyväskylä, Finland, The European Community on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences. [Available online at http://www.mit.jyu.fi/eccomas2004/proceedings/pdf/ 909.pdf.]
10. Dasey, T. J., and D. A. Hinton, 1999: Nowcasting requirements for the Aircraft Vortex Spacing System (AVOSS). Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Aviation, Range, and Aerospace Meteorology, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 10.1.
11. Dougherty, R. P., F. Y. Wang, E. R. Booth, M. E. Watts, N. Fenichel, and R. E. D'Errico, 2004: Aircraft wake vortex measurements at Denver International Airport. AIAA Paper 2004-2880, Manchester, United Kingdom.
12. Frehlich, R., and R. Sharman, 2005: Maximum likelihood estimates of vortex parameters from simulated coherent Doppler lidar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 117-130.
13. Gerz, T., F. Holzäpfel, and D. Darracq, 2002: Commercial aircraft wake vortices. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 38, 181-208.
14. Greene, G., 1986: An approximate model of vortex decay in the atmosphere. J. Aircr., 23, 566-573.
15. Hahn, K. U., 2002: Coping with wake vortex. ICAS 2002 Congress, Toronto, ON, Canada, International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences.
16. Holzäpfel, F. A., 2006: Probabilistic two-phase aircraft wake vortex model: Further development and assessment. J. Aircr., 43, 700-708.
17. Holzäpfel, F. A., T. Hofbauer, D. Darracq, H. Moet, F. Garnier, and C. F. Gago, 2003: Analysis of wake vortex decay mechanisms in the atmosphere. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 7, 263-275.
18. Köpp, F., S. Rahm, I. Smalikho, A. Dolfi, J. P. Cariou, M. Harris, and R. I. Young, 2005: Comparison of wake-vortex parameters measured by pulsed and continuous-wave lidars. J. Aircr., 42, 916-923.
19. Leweke, T., and C. H. K. Williamson, 1998: Three-dimensional dynamics of a counterrotating vortex pair. Eight Int. Sypmp. on flow Visualization, Sorrento, Italy, 271.1-271.9.
20. Luckner, R., G. Höhne, and M. Fuhrmann, 2004: Hazard criteria for wake vortex encounters during approach. Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 8, 673-687.
21. Mursch-Radlgruber, E., S. G. Bradley, and S. von Hünerbein, 2004: Vortex Detection and Ranging (VODAR). Proc. 12th Int. Symp. on Acoustic Remote Sensing, Cambridge, United Kingdom, British Antarctic Survey, 215-218.
22. Perry, R. B., D. A. Hinton, and R. A. Stuever, 1997: NASA wake vortex research for aircraft spacing. 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA 97-0057, Reno, NV, AIAA, 9 pp.
23. Proctor, F. H., and G. F. Switzer, 2000: Numerical simulation of aircraft trailing vortices. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Aviation Range and Aerospace Meteorology, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 511-516.
24. Rossow, V. J., 1999: Lift-generated vortex wakes of subsonic transport aircraft. Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 35, 507-660.
25. Rubin, W. L., 2000: Radar-acoustic detection of aircraft wake vortices. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 1058-1065.
26. Rubin, W. L., 2005: The generation and detection of sound emitted by aircraft wake vortices in ground effect. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 543-554.
27. Spalart, P. R., 1998: Airplane trailing vortices. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 30, 107-138.
28. Speijker, L. J. P., J. Kos, H. A. P. Blom, and G. B. van Baren, 2000: Probabilistic wake vortex safety assessment to evaluate separation distances for ATM operations. ICAS 2000, Harrogate, United Kingdom, National Aerospace Laboratory, NRL-TP-2000-326.
29. Stewart, E. C., 1991: A comparison of airborne wake vortex detection measurements with values predicted from potential theory. NASA Tech. Publication TP-3125, 38 pp.
30. Stumpf, E., 2005: Study of four-vortex aircraft wakes and layout of corresponding aircraft configurations. J. Aircr., 42, 722-730.