Institutional arrangements for metropolitan government and strategic planning in Auckland

New Zealand Geographer

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 43-54

  Memon, Ali ^a   Davies, Tom Graham ^b   Fookes, Tom ^b  

^a LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Auckland; Governance; Government; Institutional arrangements; Metropolitan planning; New Zealand; Sustainability; Urban growth

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; METROPOLITAN AREA; NEOLIBERALISM; REFORM PROCESS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN POLITICS;

AUCKLAND; AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND; NORTH ISLAND;

EID: 33847745285     PISSN: 00288144     EISSN: 17457939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7939.2007.00089.x     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Auckland Regional Council (2006). Draft Long-Term Community Council Plan 2006-16. Auckland.
2. Barlow IM (1991). Metropolitan Government. Routledge, London.
3. Briffault R (1999). Localism and regionalism (cited 19 May 2004). Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=198822
4. Chatterjee S (1999). The New Politics: A Third Way for New Zealand. Dunmore Press, Palmerston North.
5. Chicoine DL, Walzer L (1985). Government Structure and Local Public Finance. Oelgeschlanger, Funn and Hain, Boston.
6. Dente B (1990). Metropolitan governance reconsidered, or how to avoid errors of the third type. Governance 3, 55-74.
7. Department of Internal Affairs (1997). Pathways for Auckland: A Discussion of the Options for the Future Use of the Resources of the Auckland Regional Services Trust. DIA, Auckland.
8. Fincher R (1989). The political economy of the local state. In: Peet R, Thrift N, eds. New Models in Geography: The Political Economy Perspective, Vol. 1. Unwin-Hyman, London, pp. 169-184.
9. Giddens A (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge.
10. Gleeson B (2004). The Future of Australia's Cities. School of Environmental Planning, Griffith University, Brisbane.
11. Gleeson B, Darbas T, Lawson S (2004). Governance, sustainability and recent Australian metropolitan strategies. Urban Policy and Research 22, 345-65.
12. Hall P, Pfeiffer U (2000). Urban Future 21. A Global Agenda for Twenty-First Century Cities. E and F N Spon, London.
13. Hambleton R (1993). Reflections on urban government in the USA. Policy and Politics 21, 245-57.
14. Hamnett S, Freestone R (eds) (2000). The Australian Metropolis: A Planning History. Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
15. Harvey D (1973). Social Justice and the City. Edward Arnold, London.
16. Henton D (2002). Lessons from Silicon Valley: Governance in a global city-region. In: Scott AJ, ed. Global City-regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 391-400.
17. Heywood P (1997). The emerging social metropolis: Successful planning initiatives in five new world metropolitan regions. Progress in Planning 47, 159-250.
18. Hirst P (2000). Democracy and governance. In: Pierre J, ed. Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy. Oxford University Press, London.
19. Lee M (2000). Public merits say in how infrastructure funds spent. New Zealand Herald, 10 Feb.
20. Logan JR, Molotch HL (1987). Urban Fortunes. The Political Economy of Space. University of California Press, Berkeley.
21. Memon PA (1993). Keeping New Zealand Green: Recent Environmental Reforms. University of Otago Press, Dunedin.
22. Memon PA, Milne M, Selsky J (2004). Restructuring governance of New Zealand seaports: Geographical impacts of corporatisation. New Zealand Geographer 60, 15-27.
23. Morata F (2002). The role of the regions in the governance for sustainable development local/global axis. [Cited 6 May 2004.]Available at: http://www.iigov.org/gds/?p=1_022
24. Murphy M, Friesen W, Kearns RA (2003). The divided city and urban sustainability. In: Freeman C, Thompson-Fawcett M, eds. Living Space towards Sustainable Settlements in New Zealand. University of Otago Press, Dunedin, pp. 72-93.
25. New Zealand Business Roundtable (2004). The ARST fiasco: Full circle to nowhere. [Cited 27 Oct 2004.]Available at http://www.nzbr.org.nz/ documents/speeches/speeches-98/the-arst-fiasco.doc.htm
26. Pool I, Baxendine S, Cochrane W, Lindop J (2005). New Zealand regions, 1986-2001: Population dynamics, Discussion Paper no. 52, Population Studies Centre, University of Waikato.
27. Rankin K (1998). Whither the Auckland Regional Services Trust? [Cited 21 May 2003.]Available at http://www.ak.planet.gen.nz/~keithr/ rf98_ARST_vision.html
28. Salet WA, Thornley A, Kreukels A (2002). Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions. Spon Press, London.
29. Scott AJ, Agnew J, Soja EW, Storper M (2001). Global city-regions. In: Scott AJ, ed. Global City-regions. Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 11-32.
30. Sharpe LJ (1995). The future of metropolitan government. In: Sharpe LJ, ed. The Government of the World Cities: The Future of the Metro Model. John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 11-32.
31. Stenberg CW (1998). Structuring local government units and relationships [Cited 18 May 2004.]Available at http://www.mml.org/foundation/ structuring_relationships.htm
32. Thomas S, Memon PA (2007). New Zealand local government at the crossroads? Reflections on the recent local government reforms. Urban Policy and Research Journal, forthcoming.
33. Thornley A (2002). London: Institutional turbulence but enduring nation-state control. In: Salet WA, Thornley A, Kreukels H, eds. Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-Regions. Spon Press, London, pp. 41-56.
34. Williams G (1999). Metropolitan governance and strategic planning: A review of experience in Manchester, Melbourne and Toronto. Progress in Planning 52, 1-100.