Energetic and exergetic aspects of cotton stalk production in establishing energy policies

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 3015-3024

  Hepbasli, Arif ^a   Utlu, Zafer ^b   Akdeniz, R Cengiz ^c  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b GULHANE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

^c EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cotton stalk; Energy policy; Exergy analysis

Indexed keywords

COTTON; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY RESOURCES; ENERGY UTILIZATION; EXERGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ENERGY PRODUCTION; EXERGY EFFICIENCY;

ENERGY POLICY;

COTTON; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY RESOURCE; EXERGY; STEM;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 33847740571     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.030     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akdeniz R.C., Vardar-Sukan F., and Hepbasli A. Evaluation of Aegean region agro-industrial wastes as a potential energy source. Energy Sources 24 (2002) 949-960
2. Akdeniz C., Acaroglu M., and Hepbasli A. Cotton stalk as a potential energy source. Energy Sources 26 (2004) 65-75
3. Channiwala S.A., and Parikh P.P. A unified correlation for estimating HHV of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels. Fuel 81 (2002) 1051-1063
4. Clancy, J., 1995. Barriers to using agricultural residues as a briquetting feedstock. In: Grover, P.D., Mishra, S.K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Biomass Briquetting. Regional Wood Energy Development Programme (RWEDP) in Asia, RWEDP Report No. 23, 3-6 April, New Delhi, India, pp. 152-158.
5. Coates W. Harvesting systems for cotton plant residue. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 12 6 (1996) 639-644
6. Coates W. Using cotton plant residue to produce briquettes. Biomass & Bioenergy 18 (2000) 201-208
7. Cornelissen, R.L. www.exergy.nl, Access date: 15 June 2006.
8. Demirbas A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management 42 (2001) 1357-1378
9. Demirbas A. Turkey's energy overview beginning in the twenty-first century. Energy Conversion and Management 43 (2002) 1877-1887
10. Demirbas A. Electricity from biomass and hydroelectric development projects in Turkey. Energy Exploration and Exploitation 20 (2002) 325-335
11. Dincer I., Hussain M.M., and Al-Zaharnah I. Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Research 28 (2004) 205-243
12. Dincer I., Hussain M.M., and Al-Zaharnah I. Energy and exergy utilization in agricultural sector of Saudi Arabia. Energy Policy 33 11 (2005) 1461-1467
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2006. 〈http://www.fao.org〉, Access date: 15 June 2006.
14. Gemtos T.A., and Tsiricoglou Th. Harvesting of cotton residue for energy production. Biomass & Bioenergy 16 (1999) 51-59
15. Gemtos T.A., and Tsiricoglou Th. Energy budget of a method to harvest cotton stalks. Renewable Energy 16 (1999) 1015-1018
16. Gool W.V. Thermodynamics of chemical references for exergy analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 39 16-18 (1998) 1719-1728
17. Hepbasli A., and Ozgener O. Turkey's renewable energy sources: Part 2. Potential and utilization. Energy Sources (26) 10 (2004) 971-982
18. Hovelius K., and Hansson P.A. Energy and exergy analysis of rapeseed oil methyl ester production under Swedish conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy 17 (1999) 279-290
19. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2000. A report on a workshop of the Renewable Energy Working Party (REWP). Needs for Renewables. Paris, France.
20. Jenkins, B.M., 1980. Downdraft gasification characteristics of major California residue derived fuels. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA.
21. Jenkins B.M., and Sumner H.R. Harvesting and handling agricultural residues for energy. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 29 3 (1986) 824-836
22. Kaygusuz K. Sustainable development of hydropower and biomass energy in Turkey. Energy Conversion and Management 43 (2002) 1099-1120
23. Kaya D. Renewable energy policies in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10 2 (2006) 152-163
24. Koopmans, A., 1995. Traditional energy use and availability of agricultural and forest residues. In: Grover, P.D., Mishra, S.K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Biomass Briquetting. Regional Wood Energy Development Programme (RWEDP) in Asia, RWEDP Report No. 23, 3-6 April, New Delhi, India, pp. 123-133.
25. Kumar A., Purohit P., Rana S., and Kandpal T.C. An approach to the estimation of the value of agricultural residues used as biofuels. Biomass & Bioenergy 22 (2002) 195-203
26. Putun A.R. Biomas to bio-oil via pyrolyss of cotton straw and stalk. Energy Sources 24 3 (2002) 275-285
27. Rosen M.A., and Dincer I. On exergy and environmental impact. International Journal of Energy Research 21 (1997) 643-654
28. Rosen M.A., and Scott D.S. Entropy production and exergy destruction: Part I-Hierarchy of Earth's major constituencies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 28 12 (2003) 1307-1313
29. State Institute of Statistics (SIS), 2004. Statistical Year Book of Turkey 2003. Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
30. Sumner, H.R., Monroe, G.E., Hellwig, R.E, 1986. Puller for cotton plant stable. ASAE Paper SER-86-210.
31. Szargut J. International progress in second law analysis 1980. Energy 5 8/9 (1980) 709-718
32. Szargut J., Morris D.R., and Steward F.R. Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes (1988), Springer, New York
33. The Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, 2003. Energy Report, Ankara, Turkey, MENR, 2005.
34. Tripathi A.K., Iyer P.V.R., Kandpal T.C., and Singh K.K. Assessment of availability and costs of some agricultural residues used as feedstocks for biomass gasification and briquetting in India. Energy Conversion and Management 39 15 (1998) 1611-1618
35. Utlu, Z., Hepbasli, A., 2006a. A review on analyzing and evaluating the energy utilization efficiency of countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, in press.
36. Utlu Z., and Hepbasli A. Assessment of the energy and exergy utilization efficiencies in the Turkish agricultural sector. International Journal of Energy Research 30 (2006) 659-670
37. Utlu Z., and Hepbasli A. Parametrical investigation of the effect of dead (reference) state on energy and exergy utilization efficiencies of residential-commercial sectors: a review and an application. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 4 (2007) 603-634
38. Voivontas D., Assimacopoulos D., and Koukios E.G. Assessment of biomass for power production: a GIS based method. Biomass and Bioenergy 20 (2001) 101-112
39. Wall, G., 1977. Physical Resource Theory Group. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, Report No. 77-42.
40. Wall, G. www.exergy.se, Access date: 15 June 2006.
41. Wall G., Sciubba E., and Naso V. Exergy use in the Italien society. Energy 19 12 (1994) 1267-1274
42. Werther J., Saenger M., Hartge E.U., Ogada T., and Siagi Z. Combustion of agricultural residues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 26 (2000) 1-27