Virtual colonoscopy - And then? Relevance of small colorectal polyps;Virtuelle koloskopie - Und was dann? Zur relevanz kleiner kolorektaler polypen

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 130-136

  Rother, Tobias ^a   Knopfle E ^a   Bohndorf, K ^a  

^a KLINIKUM AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdomen; Colon; Polyps; Screening < themes; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; POLYPECTOMY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM POLYP; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST; ADENOMATOUS POLYP; COLON; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; INTESTINE POLYP; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RECTUM; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; COLON; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTESTINAL POLYPS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RECTUM; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33847739358     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-927361     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Bertz J, Hentschel S, Hundsdörfer G et al. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland 2004: 28-31
2. Vogl TJ, Pegios W, Bechstein WO et al. Radiologische Diagnostik des Rektumkarzinoms: Nachsorge und Rezidivdiagnostik. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2006; 178: 970-978
3. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland2005. http://www.destatis.de
4. Bond JH. Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000; 11: 176-184
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
6. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2191-2200
7. Hartmann D, Bassler B, Schilling D et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2006; 238: 143-149
8. Kühle CA, Ajaj W, Kinner S et al. "Fecal tagging"-MR-Kolonographie: Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie an 284 Patienten. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2006; 178: VO 360.9
9. Andersen K, Blondin D, Beck A et al. Evaluation zweier verschiedener Softwarelösungen zur Auswertung von CT-Kolonographien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1227-1234
10. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1832-1844
11. Gurung J, Maataoui A, Khan M et al. Automated detection of lung nodules in multidetector CT: influence of different reconstruction protocols on performance of a software prototype. Fortschr Rontgenstr 2006; 178: 71-77
12. Knöpnadel J, Altenhofen L, Lichtner F et al. Früherkennung des Darmkrebses und möglicher Vorstufen. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, 2005: 57
13. Correa P. Epidemiology of polyps and cancer. Major Probl Pathol 1978; 10: 126-152
14. Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW. Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 1982; 23: 835-842
15. Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3053-3063
16. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O'Brien MJ et al. The National Polyp Study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Cancer 1992; 70: 1236-1245
17. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 635-650
18. Hein P, Klessen C, Asbach P et al. Stellenwert des Fecal Tagging im Rahmen der virtuellen Koloskopie bezüglich der Detektion und Charakterisierung eines klinisch relevanten Befundes - Retrospektive Analyse über 6 Monate. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: VO 401.1
19. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002; 224: 393-403
20. Gryspeerdt S, Lefere P, Dewyspelaere J et al. Optimisation of colon cleansing prior to computed tomographic colonography. JBR-BTR 2002; 85: 289-296
21. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U et al. Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 626-631
22. Church JM. Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 481-485
23. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 127-134
24. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size. Are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 777-781
25. Liljegren A, Lindblom A, Rotstein S et al. Prevalence and incidence of hyperplastic polyps and adenomas in familial colorectal cancer: correlation between the two types of colon polyps. Gut 2003; 52: 1140-1147
26. Waye JD, Lewis BS, Frankel A et al. Small colon polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83: 120-122
27. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 8-12
28. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 2004; 232: 784-790
29. Kiesslich R, Jung M, DiSario JA et al. Perspectives of chromo and magnifying endoscopy: how, how much, when, and whom should we stain? J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 7-13
30. Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 1997; 47: 154-160
31. Hofstad B, Vatn M. Growth rate of colon polyps and cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1997; 7: 345-363
32. Loeve F, Boer R, Oortmarssen GJ van et al. The MISCAN-COLON simulation model for the evaluation of colorectal cancer screening. Comput Biomed Res 1999; 32: 13-33
33. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. The National Polyp Study. Eur J Cancer Prev 1993; 2: 83-87
34. Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG et al. National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 633-639
35. Knoernschild HE. Growth rate and malignant potential of colonic polyps: Early results. Surg Forum 1963; 14: 137-138
36. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 449-456
37. Bersentes K, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 1117-1120
38. Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE et al. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 1009-1013
39. Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH et al. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years after detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 853-862
40. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004; 291: 1713-1719
41. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 41-48
42. Gschwantler M, Kriwanek S, Langner E et al. High-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: a multivariate analysis of the impact of adenoma and patient characteristics. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14: 183-188