Progression of intermittent, small-angle, and variable esotropia in infancy

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 661-664

  Fu, Valeria L N ^a   Stager, David R ^b   Birch, Eileen E ^a,b  

^a RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERGENT STRABISMUS; DISEASE COURSE; EYE SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INFANT; INFANT DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY; EXTRAOCULAR MUSCLE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REMISSION; RISK FACTOR; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; ESOTROPIA; EYEGLASSES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; OCULOMOTOR MUSCLES; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REMISSION, SPONTANEOUS; RISK FACTORS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33847724323     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0717     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. PEDIG. The clinical spectrum of early-onset esotropia: experience of the congenital esotropia observational study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:102-108.
2. PEDIG. Spontaneous resolution of early-onset esotropia: experience of the congenital estropia observational study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:109-118.
3. Birch E, Stager D, Wright K, Beck R. The natural history of infantile esotropia during the first six months of life. JAAPOS. 1998;2:325-329.
4. Wright KW, Edelman P, McVey JH, et al. High-grade stereo acuity after early surgery for congenital esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1995;32:231-235.
5. Ing MR. Surgical alignment prior to six months of age for congenital esotropia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995;93:135-141; discussion 141-146.
6. Birch EE, Morale SE, Jeffrey BG, et al. Measurement of stereoacuity outcomes at ages 1 to 24 months: Randot Stereocards. J AAPOS. 2005;9:31-36.
7. Friis RH, Sellers TA. Epidemiology for Public Health Practice. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2004:276-284.
8. Mitchell DE, Ptito M, Lepore F. Depth perception in monocularly deprived cats following part-time reverse occlusion. Eur J Neurosci. 1994;6:967-972.
9. Blake R, Hirsch HV. Deficits in binocular depth perception in cats after alternating monocular deprivation. Science. 1975;190:1114-1116.
10. Timney B. The effects of early and late monocular deprivation on binocular depth perception in cats. Brain Res. 1983;283:235-243.
11. Timney B. Effects of brief monocular deprivation on binocular depth perception in the cat: a sensitive period for the loss of stereopsis. Vis Neurosci. 1990;5:273-280.
12. Tychsen L. Burkhalter A, Boothe RG. Neural mechanisms in infantile esotropia: what goes wrong? Am Orthopt J. 1996;46:18-28.
13. Simons K, Gotzler KC, Vitale S. Penalization versus part-time occlusion and binocular outcome in treatment of strabismic amblyopia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:2156-2160.
14. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigative Group (PEDIG). A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:268-278.
15. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigative Group (PEDIG). A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1632-1637.
16. Repka MX, Wallace DK, Beck RW, et al. Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:149-157.
17. Ellis GS Jr, Hartmann EE, Love A, et al. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgment in the diagnosis of amblyopia with strabismus. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:788-791.
18. Katz B, Sireteanu R. The Teller Acuity Card Test: possibilities and limits of clinical use. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1989;195:17-22.