Rationality crossovers

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 261-277

  Cherry, Todd L ^a,b   Shogren, Jason F ^c  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning; Rationality

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847722149     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allais M. Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'École Américaine. Econometrica 21 (1953) 503-546
2. Baron J. Thinking and deciding. 3rd ed. (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Becker G. Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70 (1962) 1-13
4. Becker G., DeGroot M., and Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 9 (1964) 226-232
5. Berg J., Dickhaut J., and O'Brien J. Preference reversal and arbitrage. In: Smith V. (Ed). Research in experimental economics Vol. 3 (1985), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT; London
6. Bohm P. Time preference and preference reversal among experienced subjects: The effect of real payments. Economic Journal 104 (1994) 1370-1378
7. Bohm P., Johan L., and Joakim S. Eliciting reservation prices: Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanisms vs markets. Economic Journal 107 (1997) 1079-1089
8. Bohm P., and Lind H. Preference reversal, real-world lotteries, and lottery-interested subjects. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22 (1993) 327-348
9. Camerer C. Individual decision making. In: Kagel J., and Roth A. (Eds). Handbook of experimental economics (1995), Princeton University Press, Princeton 587-703
10. Cherry T., Crocker T., and Shogren J. Rationality spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2003) 63-65
11. Chu Y.-P., and Chu R.-L. The subsidence of preference reversals in simplified and marketlike experimental settings. American Economic Review 80 (1990) 902-911
12. Cox J., and Grether D. The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives. Economic Theory 7 (1996) 381-405
13. Cummings R., and Taylor L. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review 89 (1999) 649-665
14. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 (1961) 528-556
15. Farrell J. Cheap talk, coordination, and entry. RAND Journal of Economics 18 (1987) 34-39
16. Fox S., Shogren J.F., Hayes D.J., and Kliebenstein J.B. CVM-X: Calibrating contingent valuation with experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1998) 455-465
17. Goldstein W., and Weber E. Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In: Busemeyer J., Hastie R., and Medin D. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation. Decision making from a cognitive perspective Vol. 32 (1995), Academic Press, San Diego 83-136
18. Grether D., and Plott C. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review 69 (1979) 623-638
19. Gunnarsson S., Shogren J., and Cherry T. Are preferences for skewness fixed or fungible?. Economics Letters 80 (2003) 113-121
20. Hayes D., Shogren J., Shin S., and Kliebenstein J. Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 (1995) 40-53
21. Irwin J., Slovic P., and Lichtenstein S. Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6 (1993) 5-18
22. In: Kahneman D., and Tversky A. (Eds). Choice, values, and frames (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Laury, S., & Taylor, L. Altruism Spillovers: Are behaviors in context-free experiments predictive of altruism toward a naturally occurring public good? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, in press.
24. Lichtenstein S., and Slovic P. Reversals of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1971) 16-20
25. Machina M. Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. In: Dasgupta P., and Mäler K.-G. (Eds). The environment and emerging development issues Vol. 1 (1997), Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford 201-255
26. March J., and Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science 33 (1987) 1404-1418
27. Mowen J., and Gentry J. Investigation of the preference-reversal phenomenon in a new product introduction task. Journal of Applied Psychology 6 (1980) 715-722
28. Nisbett R., Fong G., Lehman D., and Cheng P. Teaching reasoning. Science 238 (1987) 625-631
29. Reilly R. Preference reversal: Further evidence and some suggested modifications in experimental design. American Economic Review 72 (1982) 576-584
30. Shogren J., Fox J., Hayes D., and Roosen J. Observed choices for food safety in retail, survey, and auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 (1999) 1192-1199
31. Shogren J., Shin S., Hayes D., and Kliebenstein J. Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review 84 (1994) 255-270
32. Slovic P. The construction of preferences. In: Kahneman D., and Tversky A. (Eds). Choices, values, and frames (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 489-502
33. Slovic P., and Tversky A. Who accepts Savage's axiom?. Behavioral Science 19 (1974) 368-373
34. Smith V.L. Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology. Journal of Political Economy 99 (1991) 877-897
35. Stanovich K., and West R. Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects. Thinking & Reasoning 4 (1998) 289-317
36. Thaler R. The winner's curse (1992), Free Press, New York
37. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In: Kahneman D., and Tversky A. (Eds). Choices, values, and frames (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 209-223
38. Tversky A., Slovic P., and Kahneman D. The causes of preference reversals. American Economic Review 80 (1990) 204-217