Online data collection for psychotherapy process research

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 92-99

  Reynolds Jr , D'Arcy J ^a   Stiles, William B ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOTHERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH;

EID: 33847719555     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9987     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersson, G., Kaldo-Sandstrom, V., Strom, L., et al. (2003). Internet administration of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a sample of tinnitus patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 55:259-262.
2. Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the Internet: a discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive Psychology 8:231-246.
3. Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Harsveld, M. (1994). The incomplete equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of the general aptitude test battery. Journal of Applied Psychology 79:852-859.
4. Davis, R.N. (1999). Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: comparison with traditional methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31:572-577.
5. Agnew-Davies, R., Stiles, W.B., Hardy, G.E., et al. (1998). Alliance structure assessed by the Agnew Relationship Measure (ARM). British Journal of Clinical Psychology 37:155-172.
6. Stiles, W.B., Gordon, L.E., & Lani, J.A. (2002). Session evaluation and the session evaluation questionnaire. In: Tryon, G.S. (ed.), Counseling based on process research: applying what we know. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 325-343.
7. Schulenberg, S.E., & Yutrzenka, B.A. (1999). The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: implications for measures of negative affect. Behavior Research Method, Instruments & Computers 31:315-321.
8. George, C.E., Lankford, J.S., & Wilson, S.E. (1992). The effects of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration on measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior 8:203-209.
9. Stiles, W.B. (1980). Measurement of the impact of psychotherapy sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 48:176-185.
10. Horvath, A.O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61:561-573.
11. Hartley, D.E., Strupp, H.H. (1983). The therapeutic alliance: Its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In: Masling, J. (ed.), Empirical studies in psychoanalytic theories. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 1-37.
12. Gaston, L., & Marmar, C.R. (1994). The California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales. In: Horvath, A.O., & Greenberg, L.S. (eds.), The working alliance: theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, pp. 85-108.
13. Cummings, A.L., Slemon, A.G., & Hallberg, E.T. (1993). Session evaluation and recall of important events as a function of counselor experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology 40:156-165.
14. Dill-Standiford, T.J., Stiles, W.B., & Rorer, L.G. (1988). Counselor-client agreement on session impact. Journal of Counseling Psychology 35:47-55.
15. Stiles, W.B., Shapiro, D.A., & Firth-Cozens, J.A. (1988). Do sessions of different treatments have different impacts? Journal of Counseling Psychology 35:391-396.
16. Stiles, W.B., & Snow, J.S. (1984). Counseling session impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology 31:3-12.
17. Tryon, G.S. (1990). Session depth and smoothness in relation to the concept of engagement in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology 37:248-253.
18. Kivlighan, D.M., Jr., Angelone, E.O., & Swafford, K.G. (1991). Live supervision in individual psychotherapy: effects of therapist's intention use and client's evaluation of session effect and working alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 22:489-495.
19. Nocita, A., & Stiles, W.B. (1986). Client introversion and counseling session impact. Journal of Counseling Psychology 33:235-241.
20. Reynolds, S., Stiles, W.B., Barkham, M., et al. (1996). Acceleration of changes in session impact during contrasting time-limited psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64:577-586.
21. Stiles, W.B., Reynolds, S., Hardy, G.E., et al. (1994). Evaluation and description of psychotherapy sessions by clients using the Session Evaluation Questionnaire and the Session Impacts Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology 41:175-185.
22. Stiles, W.B., Hardy, G.E., Cahill, J., et al. (2003). The Short ARM (A short form of the Agnew Relationship Measure). Presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Society for Psychotherapy Research, Newport, RI.
23. Stiles, W.B., Agnew-Davies, R., Barkham, M., et al. (2002). Convergent validity of the Agnew Relationship Measure and the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment 14:209-220.
24. Vispoel, W.P., Boo, J., & Bleiler, T. (2001). Computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: a comparison of psychometric features and respondent preferences. Educational & Psychological Measurement 61:461-474.
25. Eastin, M.S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6:n.p.
26. Cohen, G.E., & Kerr, B.A. (1998). Computer-mediated counseling: an empirical study of a new mental health treatment. Computers in Human Services 15:13-26.