MDA-based automatic OWL ontology development

International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 103-117

  Gašević, Dragan ^a   Djurić, Dragan ^b   Devedžić, Vladan ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Model Driven Architecture; Ontology development; OWL; UML Profile; XSLT

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; SEMANTIC WEB; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

MODEL DRIVEN ARCHITECTURE; ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; ONTOLOGY METAMODELING ARCHITECTURE; SEMANTIC WEB LANGUAGES;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 33847719437     PISSN: 14332779     EISSN: 14332787     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10009-006-0002-1     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baclawski K., Kokar M., Kogut P., Hart L., Smith J., Letkowski J., Emery P. (2002). Extending the Unified Modeling Language for ontology development. Int J Softw. Syst. Modeling 1(2):142-156
2. Baclawski, K., Kokar, M., Smith, J., Wallace, E., Letkowski, J., Koethe, M., Kogut, P.: UOL: Unified Ontology Language. Assorted papers discussed at the DC Ontology SIG meeting http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ontology/ 2002-11-02 (2002)
3. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Stein, L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/ (2004)
4. Berners-Lee T. (1999). Weaving the Web. Orion Business Books, London
5. Bézivin, J.: From Object Composition to Model Transformation with the MDA. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference and Exhibition on Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, Santa Barbara, USA, pp. 350-355 (2001)
6. Bock C. (2003). UML without pictures. IEEE Software 20(5):33-35
7. Brickley, D., Guha, R.: (eds.) Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation http://www.w3.org/ TR/2000/CR-rdf-schema-20000327 (2000)
8. Chandrasekaran B., Josephson J., Benjamins R. (1999). What are ontologies, and why do we need them?. IEEE Intell. Syst. 14(1):20-26
9. Chaudhri, V., Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Karp, P., Rice, J.: OKBC: A programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability. In: Proceedings of the 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 600-607 (1998)
10. Cranefield, S.: Networked knowledge representation and Exchange using UML and RDF. J. Digi. inf. 1(8) http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk (2001)
11. Damjanović V. (2003). Semantic Web, Ontologies, and Agents. Honors degree thesis, University of Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro
12. Denny, M.: Ontology Tools Survey, Revisited http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/ 2004/07/14/onto.html (2004)
13. Devedžić V. (2002). Understanding Ontological Engineering. Communications of the ACM 45(4):136-144
14. Dirckze, R. (ed.) Java Metadata Interface (JMI) Specification Version 1.0 http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr040/index.html (2002)
15. Djurić D., Gašević D., Devedžić V. (2005). Ontology modeling and MDA. J. Object Techno. 4(1):109-129
16. Duddy K. (2002). UML2 must enable a family of languages. Commun. ACM 45(11):73-75
17. Falkovych K., Sabou M., Stuckenschmidt H. (2003). UML for the semantic web: Transformation-based approaches. In: Omelayenko B, Klein M (eds) Knowledge Transformation for the Semantic Web. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 95. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 92-106
18. Fensel D., van Harmelen F., Horrocks I., McGuinness D., Patel-Schneider P. (2001). OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2):38-45
19. Gašvić, D., Devedžić, V.: Reusing petri nets through the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, Heraklion, Greece, 2004. LNCS 3053. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 284-298 (2004)
20. Gašvić, D., Damjanović, V., Devedžić, V.: Analysis of the MDA standards in ontological engineering. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Information Technology, Bhubaneswar, India, pp. 193-196 (2003)
21. Gómez-Pérez A., Corcho O. (2002). Ontology languages for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17(1):54-60
22. Gruber T. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2):199-220
23. Juerjens J. (2003). Secure Systems Development with UML. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
24. Karp, P., Myers, K., Gruber, T.: The generic frame protocol. In: Proceedings of the 1995 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Monreal, Canada. pp. 768-774 (1995)
25. Kogut P., Cranefield S., Hart L., Dutra M., Baclawski K., Kokar M., Smith J. (2002). UML for ontology development. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 17(1):61-64
26. McGuinness D., Fikes R., Hendler J., Stein L. (2002). DAML+OIL: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17(5):72-80
27. Miller, J., Mukerji, O: (eds.) MDA Guide: Version 1.0, OMG Document: omg/ 2003-05-01 http://www.omg.org/mda/mda_files/MDA_Guide_Version1-0.pdf (2003)
28. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. TR SMI-2001-0880, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University (2001)
29. Noy, N.F., Fergerson, R., Musen, M.: The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: Combining interoperability and flexibility. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 17-32 (2000)
30. Noy N.F., Sintek M., Decker S., Crubézy M., Fergerson R., Musen M. (2001). Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2):60-71
31. Ontology Definition Metamodel Preliminary Revised Submission to OMG RFP ad/2003-03-40, Volume 1 http://codip.grci.com/odm/draft (2004)
32. Ontology Definition Metamodel, DSTC Initial Submission. OMG Document ad/ 2003-08-01 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/03-08-01 (2003)
33. Ontology Definition Metamodel, Gentleware Initial Submission. OMG Document ad/03-08-09 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/03-08-09 (2003)
34. Ontology Definition Metamodel, IBM Initial Submission. OMG Document ad/ 03-07-02 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/03-07-02 (2003)
35. OMG Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification v1.4. OMG Document formal/ 02-04-03 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?formal/02-04-03.pdf (2002)
36. OMG Ontology Definition Metamodel Request for Proposal. OMG Document: Ad/ 2003-03-40 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/2003-03-40 (2003)
37. Ontology Definition Metamodel, Sandpiper Software Inc and KSL Initial Submission. OMG Document ad/03-08-06 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ad/ 03-08-06 (2003)
38. OMG Unified Modeling Language Specification v1.5. OMG Document formal/ 03-03-01 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?formal/03-03-01.zip (2003)
39. OMG XMI Specification, v1.2. OMG Document formal/02-01-01 http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/2002-01-01 (2002)
40. Seidewitz E. (2003). What Models Mean. IEEE Software 20(5):26-32
41. Selic B. (2003). The pragmatics of model-driven Development. IEEE Software 20(5):19-25
42. Sigel, J.: Developing in OMG's Model-Driven Architecture, Revision 2.6. OMG's White Paper ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/-omg/01-12-01.pdf (2001)