Morphological reversals

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 33-61

  Baerman, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847714182     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226706004440     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Alderete, J. (2001). Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 18. 201-253.
2. Anderson, S. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Anderson, S. & Browne, W. (1973). On keeping exchange rules in Czech. Papers in Linguistics 6. 445-482.
4. Bever, T. (1963). Theoretical implications of Bloomfield's 'Menomini Morphophonemics'. MIT, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Quarterly Progress Report 68. 197-203.
5. Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based declensions in Estonian. In Booij, G. & van Marie, J. (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2005. Heidelberg: Springer. 1-25.
6. Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English, New York: Harper and Row.
7. Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Corbett, G., Baerman, M., Brown, D. & Hippisley, A. (2006). The Surrey deponency databases. Available online at 〈http://www.smg.surrey. ac.uk/deponency/Deponency_home.htm〉.
9. Creason, S. (2004). Aramaic. In Woodard, R. D. (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the world's ancient languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 391-426.
10. de Lacy, P. (2002). A formal theory of 'exchange rules': morpheme distinctiveness in DhoLuo. Presented at the Phonology Reading Group, University College, London.
11. DiCanio, C. (forthcoming). The phonetics of tone and laryngealization in Trique. To appear in UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report.
12. Fitzpatrick, J., Nevins, A. & Vaux, B. (2004). Exchange rules and feature-value variables: evidence from Zok vocalic inversion. Presented at the 3rd North American Phonology Conference.
13. Glennon, J. & Glennon, A. (1994). Nehan grammar essentials, Ms., Summer Institute of Linguistics.
14. Glinert, L. (1989). The grammar of Modern Hebrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Gregersen, E. A. (1972). Consonant polarity in Nilotic. In Voeltz, E. (ed.), Third Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Bloomington : Indiana University. 105-109.
16. Harris, A. (2003). Cross-linguistic perspectives on syntactic change. In Joseph, B. & Janda, R. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. 529-551.
17. Hetzron, R. (1967). Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12. 169-193.
18. Hetzron, R. (1969). The morphology of the verb in Modern Syriac (Christian colloquial of Urmi). Journal of the American Oriental Society 89. 112-127.
19. Hoberman, R. (1989). The syntax and semantics of verb morphology in modern Aramaic. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.
20. Hollenbach, B. E. (1976). Tense-negation interplay in Copala Trique. International Journal of American Linguistics 42.126-132.
21. Hollenbach, B. E. (1992). A syntactic sketch of Copala Trique. In Bradley, C. H. & Hollenbach, B. E. (eds.), Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages (vol. 4). Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington. 173-431.
22. Hollenbach, B. E. (2005). Gramática popular del triqui de Copala. Ms, Instituto lingüístico de Verano. Available online at 〈http://www.sil.org/~hollenbachb/PDFs/trcGRMo5.pdf〉.
23. Hopkins, S. (1989). Neo-Aramaic dialects and the formation of the preterite. Journal of Semitic Studies 37. 74-90.
24. Jastrow, O. (1988). Der neuaramäische Dialekt von Hertevin (Provinz Siirt). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
25. Kapeliuk, O. (1996). Is Modern Hebrew the only 'Indo-Europeanized' Semitic language? And what about Neo-Aramaic? Israel Oriental Studies 16. 59-70.
26. Khan, G. (1999a). The verbal system of the Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Arbel. Journal of the American Oriental Society 120/3. 321-332.
27. Khan, G. (1999b). A grammar of Neo-Aramaic: the dialect of the Jews of Arbel. Leiden: Brill.
28. Khan, G. (2002). The Neo-Aramaic dialect of Qaraqosh. Leiden: Brill.
29. Khan, G. (2004). The Jewish Neo-Aramaic dialect of Sulemaniyya and Halabja. Leiden: Brill.
30. Lecarme, J. (2002). Gender 'polarity': theoretical aspects of Somali nominal morphology. In Boucher, P. (ed.), Many morphologies. Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Press. 109-141.
31. Matthews, P. (1974). Morphology: an introduction to the theory of word structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Meinhof, C. (1912). Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Hamburg: Friederichsen.
33. Moreton, E. (2003). Non-computable functions in Optimality Theory. In McCarthy, J. (ed.), Optimality Theory in phonology. Oxford: Blackwell. 141-164.
34. Mortensen, D. (2002). Semper infidelis: theoretical dimensions of tone sandhi chains in Jingpho and A-Hmao. Ms., University of California at Berkeley.
35. Nöldeke, T. (1868). Grammatik der neusyrischen Sprache am Urmia-See und in Kurdistan, Leipzig: Weigel.
36. Okoth-Okombo, D. (1982). Dholuo morphophonemics in a generative framework. Berlin: Reimer.
37. Ross, M. (1988). Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
38. Serzisko, F. (1982). Numerus/Genus-Kongruenz und das Phänomen der Polarität am Beispiel einiger ostkuschitischen Sprachen. In Seiler, H. & Stachowiak, F. J. (eds.), Apprehension. Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen (vol. 2). Tübingen: Narr. 179-200.
39. Smith, L. (1979). Labrador Inuttut inverted number marking, exchange rules and morphological markedness. Linguistics 17.153-167.
40. Speiser, E. A. (1938). The pitfalls of polarity. Language 14. 187-202.
41. Spencer, A. (1998). Morphological operations. In Spencer, A. & Zwicky, A. (eds.), The handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell. 123-143.
42. Stonham, J. T. (1994). Combinatorial morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
43. Tucker, A. N. (1994). A grammar of Kenya Luo (Dholuo). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
44. Voegelin, C. F. (1935). Tübutulabal grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Weigel, W. F. (1993). Morphosyntactic toggles. In Papers from the 29th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 467-478.
46. Wolf, M. (2005). For an autosegmental theory of mutation (Rutgers Optimality Archive 754-0705). Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.