Distributed group work in a remote programming laboratory - A comparative study

International Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 162-170

  Böhne, Andreas ^a   Faltin, Nils ^a   Wagner, Bernardo ^a  

^a L3S RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; CSCL; Evaluation; Programming laboratory; Remote laboratory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847704898     PISSN: 0949149X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gillet, D., Geoffroy, F., Zeramdini, K., Nguyen, A. V., Rekik, Y. and Piguet, Y., The Cockpit, an effective metaphor for web-based experimentation in engineering education, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 19(3), 2003, pp. 389-397.
2. Andreas Böhne, Klaus Rütters, Bernardo Wagner, Evaluation of tele-tutorial support in a remote programming laboratory, Proc. 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conf., Salt Lake City, USA.
3. Lindsay, E. D. and Good, M. C., Effects of access modes upon students' perceptions of learning objectives and outcomes, Proc. 15th Conf. Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Toowoomba, Australia, 27-29 Sept 2004, pp. 186-197.
4. Ogot, M., Elliot, G. and Glumac, N., An assessment of in-person and remotely operated laboratories, J. Eng. Educ., 92, 2003, pp. 57-64.
5. Tuttas, J., Rütters, K., and Wagner, B., Telepresent vs. traditional learning environments - a field study, Int. Conf. Engineering Education, July 21-25, 2003, Valencia, Spain.
6. Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity, Proc. 32nd Annual Hawaii Int. Conf. System Sciences, 1999, Los Alamos
7. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. and McGuire, T. W., Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication, American Psychologist, 39(10), 1984, pp. 1123-1134.
8. Manuela Paechter, Wissenskommunikation, Kooperation und Lernen in virtuellen Gruppen, Lengerich: Pabst (2003).
9. Martina Dittler, Computervermittelte Kommunikation in netzbasierten Lernszenarien. Eine empirische Studie über die Effekte unterschiedlicher Kommunikationsbedingungen auf Lernprozess, Lernerfolg und sozio-emotionale Aspekte bei der kooperativen Bearbeitung von computergestützten Lernfällen, München: Herbert Utz (2001).
10. Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C. and Maglaughin, K. L. Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: results of a controlled experiment, A CM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 10(2), 2003, pp. 150-176.
11. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., and O'Malley, C., The evolution of research on collaborative learning, in P. Reimann and H. Spada (eds) Learning in Humans and Machines: Towards an Interdiciplinary Learning Science Oxford: Elsevier (1996) pp. 189-211.
12. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C.-L. C., Meta-Analysis in Education, Int. J. Educational Research, 13, 1989, pp. 221-340.
13. Andreas Böhne, Nils Faltin, Bernardo Wagner, Synchronous tele-tutorial support in a remote laboratory for process control, Int. Conf. Engineering Education, July 21-25, 2003, Valencia, Spain.
14. Grath, J. E., A typology of tasks, in Ronald M. Baecker (ed.), Readings in Groupware And Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Assisting Human-Human Collaboration, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1993) pp. 165-168.
15. Prenzel, M., Kristen, A., Dengler, P., Ettle, R. and Beer, T., Selbstbestimmt motiviertes und interessiertes Lernen in der kaufmännischen Erstausbildung, in Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (ZBW), Beiheft 13, (1996) pp. 108-127.
16. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical theory, in Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (eds) Handbook of Self-Determination Research, Rochester: University of Rochester Press, (2002) pp. 3-33.