An explicit multi-level time-step algorithm to model the propagation of interacting acoustic-elastic waves using finite element/finite difference coupled procedures

CMES - Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-34

  Soares Jr , D ^a,b   Mansur, W J ^a   Lima, D L ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF JUIZ DE FORA   (Brazil)

^c PETROBRAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Elastodynamics; Finite differences; Finite elements; Marine risers; Multi level time steps; Partitioned coupled systems

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVES; ELASTIC WAVES; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MARINE RISERS;

ACOUSTIC-ACOUSTIC COUPLING; ELASTODYNAMICS; MULTI-LEVEL TIME-STEPS; PARTITIONED COUPLED SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 33847698993     PISSN: 15261492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alford, R.M.; Kelly, K.R.; Boore, D.M. (1974): Accuracy of finite difference modelling of the acoustic wave equation, Geophysics, vol. 39, pp. 834-842.
2. Bathe, K.J. (1996): Finite element procedures, 1 ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
3. Belytschko, T.; Hughes T. (1983): Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
4. Belytschko, T.; Lu, Y.Y. (1993): Explicit multi-time step integration for first and second order finite element semi-discretization, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 108, pp. 353-383.
5. Bulcão, A. (2005): Modeling and reverse time migration using elastic and acoustic operators, Ph.D. Thesis (in Portuguese), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
6. Chen, B.F. (1998): Hybrid three-dimensional finite-difference and finite-element analysis of seismic wave induced fluid-structure interaction of a vertical cylinder, Ocean Engineering, vol. 25, pp. 639-656.
7. Cohen, G.; Joly, P. (1990): Fourth order schemes for the heterogeneous acoustic equation, Com puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 80, pp. 397-407.
8. Collino, F.; Joly, P.; Millot F. (1997): Fictitious domain method for unsteady problems: application to electromagnetic scattering, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 138, pp. 907-938.
9. Daniel, W.J.T. (1997): Analysis and implementation of a new constant acceleration subcycling algorithm, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 40, pp. 2841-2855.
10. Hughes, T.J.R. (2000): The finite element method - linear static and dynamic finite element analysis, 2 ed., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
11. Hulbert, G.M.; Hughes, T.J.R. (1990): Space-time finite element methods for second-order hyperbolic equations, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 84, pp. 327-348.
12. Levander, A.R. (1988): Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV seismograms, Geophysics, vol. 53, pp. 1425-1436.
13. Lie, S.T.; Yu, G. Y.; Zhao, Z. (2001): Coupling of BEM/FEM for time domain structural-acoustic interation problems, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol.2, pp. 171-180.
14. Lima, D.L. (2004): Through-riser acoustic communication system for ultra-deep water completion, M.Sc. Thesis (in Portuguese), Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
15. Lombard, B. (2002): Modélisation Numérique de la Propagation des Ondes Acoustiques et Elastiques en Présence d'Interfaces, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aix-Marseille II, France.
16. Lombard, B.; Piraux, J. (2004): Numerical treatment of two-dimensional interfaces for acoustic and elastic waves, Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 195, pp. 90-116.
17. Ritchmeyer, R.D.; Morton, K.W. (1967): Difference methods for initial value problems, Interscience, New York.
18. Smolinski, P. (1996): Subcycling integration with non-integer time steps for structural dynamics problems, Computers & Structures, vol. 59, pp. 273-281.
19. Soares Jr, D.; Carrer, J.A.M.; Mansur, W.J. (2005a): Non-linear elastodynamic analysis by the BEM: an approach based on the iterative coupling of the D-BEM and TD-BEM formulations, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, vol. 29, pp. 761-774.
20. Soares Jr, D.; Mansur, W.J. (2005b): An efficient time-domain BEM/FEM coupling for acoustic-elastodynamic interaction problems, CMES: Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, vol.8, pp. 153-164.
21. Soares Jr, D.; von Estorff, O.; Mansur, W.J. (2004): Iterative coupling of BEM and FEM for nonlinear dynamic analyses, Computational Mechanics, vol. 34, pp. 67-73.
22. Soares Jr, D.; von Estorff, O.; Mansur, W.J. (2005c): Efficient nonlinear solid-fluid interaction analysis by an iterative BEM/FEM coupling, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 64, pp. 1416-1431.
23. Tamma, K.K.; Zhou X.; Sha D. (2000). The time dimension: a theory towards the evolution, classification, characterization and design of computational algorithms for transient/dynamic applications, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 67-290.
24. Virieux, J. (1986): P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite difference method, Geophysics, vol. 51, pp. 889-901.
25. Xing, J.T.; Price, W.G.; Chen, Y.G. (2003): A mixed finite-element finite-difference method for nonlinear fluid-structure interaction dynamics - I. Fluid-rigid structure interaction, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., vol. 459, pp. 2399-2430.
26. Zhang, C.; LeVeque, R.J. (1997): The immersed interface method for acoustic wave equations with discontinuous coefficients, Wave Motion, vol. 25, pp. 237-263.
27. th ed., Mc-Graw-Hill.