A rebuttal: Secret ties to industry and conflicting interests in cancer research [1]

American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 235-236

  McLaughlin, Joseph K ^a   Boice Jr , John D ^a   Tarone, Robert E ^a   Blot, William J ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER; CANCER RESEARCH; CARCINOGENICITY; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DEONTOLOGY; FUNDING; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; LAW SUIT; LETTER; PEER REVIEW; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RESEARCH ETHICS;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DISCLOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; NEOPLASMS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PUBLICATION BIAS; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 33847691169     PISSN: 02713586     EISSN: 10970274     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20426     Document Type: Letter

References (18)

1. Boice JD Jr, McLaughlin JK. 2006. Concerning mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma. Br J Cancer 95:130.
2. Doll R. 2001. Defamatory article by Martin Walker. Occup Environ Med 58:136-137.
3. Hardell L. 2004. From phenoxyacetic acids to cellular telephones: Is there historic evidence of the precautionary principle in cancer prevention? Int J Health Services 4:25-37.
4. Hardell L, Mild KH. 2004. Re: Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma. Am J Epidemiol 160:923.
5. Hardell L, Mild KH. 2005. Re: Mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma. Epidemiology 16:415.
6. Hardell L, Mild KH. 2006a. Re: Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: Results of the interphone case-control study in five North European countries. Br J Cancer 94:1348-1349.
7. Hardell L, Mild KH. 2006b. Re: Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults. BMJ 332:1035.
8. Hardell L, Mild KH, Påhlson A, Hallquist A. 2001. Ionizing radiation, cellular telephones and the risk of brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 10:523-529.
9. Hardell L, Hallquist A, Mild KH, Carlberg M, Påhlson A, Lilja A. 2002. Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:377-386.
10. Hardell L, Mild KH, Kundi M. 2005. Re: Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. Am J Epidemiol 162:600-601.
11. Hardell L, Walker MJ, Walhjalt B, Friedman LS, Richter ED. 2007. Secret ties to industry and conflicting interests in cancer research. Am J Ind Med; in press. doi://10.1002/ajim.20357.
12. Johansen C, Boice JD Jr, McLaughlin JK, Olsen JH. 2001. Cellular telephones and cancer-A nationwide study in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:203-207.
13. Johnsen SP, Larsson H, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK, Nörgård B, Friis S, Sørensen HT. 2005. Risk of hospitalization for myocardial infarction among users of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and other NSAIDs. Arch Intern Med 165:978-984.
14. Mealey's Emerging Toxic Torts. October 4, 2002. Daubert applied to exclude cell phone plaintiff expert; motion to amend denied. Mealey's Emerging Toxic Torts 11(13):3-4.
15. Microwave News. 2001. Swedish scientists in public row over statements to the press on health risks of mobile phone radiation. Microwave News, September/October:7.
16. Parascandola M. 2002. Judge rejects cancer data in Maryland cell phone suit. Science 298:338.
17. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Hansen J, McLaughlin JK, Kolstad H, Christensen JM, Tarone RE, Olsen JH. 2003. Cancer risk among workers at Danish companies using trichloroethylene: A cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 158:1182-1192.
18. U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. 2002. Christopher Newman, et al. v. Motorola, Inc., et al. Civil No. CCB-00-2609.