Shapley game for expansion planning of generating companies at many non-coincident criteria

IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1630-1637

  Voropai, Nikolai I ^a   Ivanova, Ekaterina Yu ^a  

^a ENERGY SYSTEMS INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Cooperative game; Expansion planning; Generating companies; Shapley value

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; GAME THEORY; PLANNING;

COOPERATIVE GAME; EXPANSION PLANNING; GENERATING COMPANIES; SHAPLEY VALUE;

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847683425     PISSN: 08858950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873053     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. N. I. Voropai, S. V. Podkovalnikov, and V. V. Trufanov, "Methodical principles of making decisions on electric power system expansion in a market environment," in Proc. IEEE Porto Power Tech Conf., Porto, Portugal, Sep. 10-13, 2001, vol. 3, pp. 136-142.
2. G. Owen, Game Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1968, p. 322.
3. H. Moulin, Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making p. 436, 1988. Cambridge.
4. J. K. Dillard and H. R. Sets, "An introduction of the study of company planning by operational gaming models," Trans. AIEE, vol. 78, no 12, pp. 1284-1290, 1959.
5. L. S. Belyaev, Solution of Complex Optimization Problems Under Uncertainty (in Russian). Novosibirsk, Russia: Nauka, 1978, p. 128.
6. F. F. Wu and J. Contreras, "Coalition formation in transmission expansion planning," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1144-1151, Aug. 1999.
7. A. Orths and Z. A. Styczynski, "Game-theoretical approach to power network planning," in Proc. IEEE Porto Power Tech Conf., Porto, Portugal, Sep. 10-13, 2001, pp. 231-236.
8. A. S. Chuang, F. F. Wu, and P. Varaiya, "A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: Problem formulation and numerical comparison," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 885-891, Nov. 2001.
9. A. I. Karpovich, V. G. Kitushin, and A. V. Malkov, "On the notion of associative organizations in energy," (in Russian) Izv. RAN. Energetika, no. 2, pp. 148-154, 2002.
10. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley, 1976, p. 340.
11. R. L. Keeney, Siting Energy Facilities. New York: Academic, 1980, p. 270.
12. V. Neimane and G. Andersson, "Distribution networks reinforcement planning: A dynamic multi-criteria approach," in Proc. IEEE Budapest Power Tech Conf., Budapest, Hungary, Aug. 29-Sep. 2 1999, pp. 306-311.
13. H. Sun and D. C. Yu, "A multi-objective optimization model of transmission enhancement planning for independent transmission company (ITC)," in Proc. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Summer Meeting, Seattle, WA, Jul. 16-20, 2000, pp. 171-176.
14. N. I. Voropai and E. Y. Ivanova, "Multi-criteria decision analysis techniques in electric power system expansion planning," Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 71-78, 2001.
15. N. I. Voropai, "Investment and development of electric power industry in market environment," in Proc. PowerCon, Kunming, China, Oct. 13-17, 2002, vol. 1, pp. 32-35.
16. N. I. Voropai, V. V. Trufanov, and V. V. Selifanov, "Modeling of power systems expansion and estimation of system efficiency of their integrations in the liberalised environmental," in Proc. CIGRE Session, 2004, p. 6.
17. N. I. Voropai and E. Y. Ivanova, "The analysis on many preference relations in electric power system expansion planning," in Proc. IEEE Porto Power Tech Conf., Porto, Portugal, Sep. 10-13, 2001, pp. 361-365.
18. J. Von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1947, p. 328.
19. N. N. Vorobiev, Game Theory for Economic Cybernetics Specialist (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Nauka, 1985, p. 270.