Performance evaluation of SUPERPAVE and Marshall asphalt mix designs to suite Jordan climatic and traffic conditions

Construction and Building Materials

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1732-1740

  Asi, Ibrahim M ^a  

^a HASHEMITE UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Asphalt mix design; Creep; Fatigue; Marshall; Performance grading; Rutting; SUPERPAVE; Temperature zoning

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCRETES; CREEP; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

ASPHALT MIX DESIGN; MARSHALL; PERFORMANCE GRADING; RUTTING; SUPERPAVE; TEMPERATURE ZONING;

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS;

EID: 33847679520     PISSN: 09500618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.036     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bahia HU. Bibliographies for physical properties of asphalt cement. SHRP-A-626, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods vol. 4.03 (1997), ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA
3. Asi IM. Role of roads in traffic safety. Traffic safety...everybody's responsibility symposium. Jordan: Hashemite University; 2004.
4. Roberts F., Mohammad M., and Wang L. History of hot mix asphalt mixture design in the USA. J Mater Civil Eng 14 4 (2002) 279-293
5. American Society for Testing And Materials (ASTM). Standard test methods vol. 4.03 (2000), ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA
6. Brown R, Kandhal P, Zhang J. Performance testing for hot mix asphalt. National Center for Asphalt Technology, Report No. 2001-05A, Auburn University, Alabama; 2001.
7. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Background of SUPERPAVE asphalt mixture design and analysis. Publication No. FHWA-SA-95-003, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC; 1995.
8. Cominsky RJ, Huber GA, Kennedy TW, Anderson M. The Superpave mix design manual for new construction and overlay. SHRP-A-407, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 1994.
9. Anderson RM. SUPERPAVE level 1 mixture design example. A first look at volumetric mix design in the SUPERPAVE system. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute Research Center; 1993.
10. Sousa J, Harvey J, Painter L, Deacon J, Monismith C. Evaluation of laboratory procedures for compacting asphalt-aggregate mixtures. Report SHRP-A/UWP-91-523, University of California - Berkeley, September, 1991.
11. Ministry of Public Works and Housing. Specifications for Highway and Bridge Construction. vol. II, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan; 1991.
12. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).LTPPbind software [Computer program]. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC; 1999.
13. Asphalt Institute. Superpave Mix Design Series No. 2 (SP-2), Asphalt Institute Research Center, Lexington, KY; 2001.
14. Anderson R, Bahia H. Evaluation and selection of aggregate gradations for asphalt mixtures using SUPERPAVE. Transportation Research Record 1583. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC; 1997. pp. 91-97.
15. Witczak M, Schwartz C, Von Quintus H. NCHRP Project 9-19: Superpave support and performance models management. Interim Report, Federal Highway Administration and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program; 2001.