Are day hospitals effective for acutely ill psychiatric patients? A European multicenter randomized controlled trial

Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 278-287

  Kallert, Thomas W ^a,b   Priebe, Stefan ^c   McCabe, Rosemarie ^c   Kiejna, Andrzej ^d   Rymaszewska, Joanna ^d   Nawka, Pětr ^e   Očvár, Ladislav ^e   Raboch, Jiří ^f   Stárková Kališová, Lucie ^f   Koch, Rainer ^b   Schützwohl, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL CARL GUSTAV CARUS   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^e Psychiatric Hospital   (Slovakia)

^f CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAY CARE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTOXICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIAL DISABILITY; SOCIAL STATUS; SOMATIZATION;

EID: 33847676302     PISSN: 01606689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v68n0214     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Senano A, et al. Day hospital versus admission for acute psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, 2003:3, Oxford, England: Update Software
2. Zwerling I, Wilder JF. An evaluation of the applicability of the day hospital in the treatment of acutely disturbed patients. Isr Ann Psychiatr Relat Discip 1964;2:162-185
3. Kris EB. Day hospitals. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1965;18:320-323
4. Herz MI, Endicott J, Spitzer RL, et al. Day versus inpatient hospitalization: a controlled study. Am J Psychiatry 1971;127:1371-1382
5. Dick P, Cameron L, Cohen D, et al. Day and full time psychiatric treatment: a controlled comparison. Br J Psychiatry 1985;147:246-250
6. Creed F, Black D, Anthony P, et al. Randomised controlled trial of day patient versus in-patient psychiatric treatment. BMJ 1990;300:1033-1037
7. Schene AH, van Wijngaarden B, Poelijoe NW, et al. The Utrecht comparative study on psychiatric day treatment and in-patient treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;87:427-436
8. Nienhuis FJ, Giel R, Kluiter H, et al. Efficacy of psychiatric day treatment: course and outcome of psychiatric disorders in a randomised trial. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994;244:73-80
9. Creed F, Mbaya P, Lancashire S, et al. Cost effectiveness of day and inpatient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997;314:1381-1385
10. Sledge WH, Tebes J, Rakfeldt J, et al. Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, pt 1: clinical outcomes. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153:1065-1073
11. Horvitz-Lennon M, Normand SLT, Gaccione P, et al. Partial versus full hospitalization for adults in psychiatric distress: a systematic review of the published literature. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:676-685
12. Kallert TW, Schützwohl M, Kiejna A, et al. Efficacy of psychiatric day hospital treatment: review of research findings and design of a European multi-centre study. Arch Psychiatr Psychother 2002;2:55-71
13. Kallert TW, Priebe S, Schützwohl M, et al. The role of acute day hospital treatment for mental health care: research context and practical problems of carrying out the international multi-centre EDEN-study. In: Kirch W, ed. Public Health in Europe. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2004:153-171
14. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:663-694
15. Abraham WT, Russel DW. Missing data: a review of current methods and applications in epidemiological research. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2004;17:315-321
16. de Jong A. Development of the International Classification of Mental Health Care (ICMHC). Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2000;405:8-13
17. Kallert TW, Schützwohl M. Randomised controlled trials in mental health services research: practical problems of implementation [in German]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002;70:647-656
18. Kallert TW, Schützwohl M, Matthes C. EDEN-Study Group. The Client Socio-demographic and Clinical History Inventory. Dresden, Germany: Dresden University of Technology, Faculty of Medicine; 2000
19. Ventura J, Green MF, Shaner A, et al. Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: "The Drift Busters." Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 1993;3:221-244
20. Schützwohl M, Jarosz-Nowak J, Briscoe J, et al. EDEN-study group. Inter-rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule in a European multi-site randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day hospitals. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003;12:197-207
21. Priebe S, Gruyters T, Heinze M, et al. Subjective criteria for evaluation of psychiatric care: methods for assessment in research and routine care [in German]. Psychiatr Prax 1995;22:140-144
22. Oliver JPJ, Huxley P, Bridges Y, et al. Quality of Life and Mental Health Services. London, UK: Routledge; 1996
23. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, et al. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999;45:7-12
24. Wiersma D, de Jong A, Kraaijkamp HJM, et al. GSDS II: The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule, Second Revision: Manual, Questionnaire and Rating Form. Groningen, Germany: Department of Social Psychiatry, University of Groningen; 1990
25. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York, NY: Springer; 2000
26. Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, et al. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:112-123
27. Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, et al. Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 2000;355:1064-1069
28. SAS/STAT User's Guide Version 9. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc; 2003
29. Allison PD. Missing Data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2002
30. Schene A. The effectiveness of psychiatric partial hospitalization and day care. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2004;17:303-309
31. Kallert TW, Glöckner M, Priebe S, et al. A comparison of psychiatric day hospitals in five European countries: implications of their diversity for day hospital research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39:777-788
32. Kallert TW, Matthes C, Glöckner M, et al. Acute psychiatric day hospital treatment: is the effectiveness of this treatment approach still questionable? [in German] Psychiatr Prax 2004;31:409-419
33. Schützwohl M, Koch R, Kallert TW. On the efficacy of acute psychiatric day-care treatment in a one-year follow-up [in German]. Psychiatr Prax [Epub ahead of print] Nov 15, 2006
34. Priebe S, Jones G, McCabe R, et al. Effectiveness and costs of acute day hospital treatment as compared with conventional in-patient care: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:243-249
35. Adamowski T, Hadrys T, Rymaszewska A, et al. Effectiveness of treatment in day hospital versus inpatient ward evaluated by patients' psychopathological symptoms and subjective quality of life analysis [in Polish]. Psychiatr Pol 2005;39:1077-1092
36. Kitzlerova E, Howardova A, Pubal K, et al. Economic aspects of daily psychiatric care, 2: comparison of patients in day care and classical hospitalization [in Czech]. Cesk Psychiatr 2005;101:148-154
37. Kluiter H, Giel R, Nienhuis FJ, et al. Predicting feasibility of day treatment for unselected patients referred for inpatient psychiatric treatment: results from a randomized trial. Am J Psychiatry 1992;149:1199-1205
38. Rothwell PM. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?" Lancet 2005;365:82-93
39. Sledge WH, Tebes J, Wolff N, et al. Day hospital/crisis respite versus inpatient care, pt 2: service utilization and costs. Am J Psychiatry 1996;153:1074-1083
40. Briggs AH. A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:69-82