The values of IT in elderly care

Information Technology and People

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 72-84

  Hedström, Karin ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Communication technologies; Elder care; Sweden

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847671462     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840710730563     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, J.P. (2005), "Value conflicts in enterprise systems", Information Technology & People, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 33-49.
2. Avison, D., Baskerville, R. and Myers, M. (2001), "Controlling action research projects", Information Technology & People, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 28-45.
3. Beck, E. (1997), "Managing diffracted rationalities: IT in a home assistance service", in Moser, I. and Aas, G.H. (Eds), Technology and Democracy: Gender, Technology and Politics in Transition?, Centre for Technology and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo, pp. 109-32.
4. Bijker, W. (1995), Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bijker, W. and Law, J. (Eds) (1994), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Cronholm, S. and Goldkuhl, G. (2002), "Document driven systems development: an approach involving novice users", Proceedings for UKAIS, Leeds.
7. Goldkuhl, G. and Cronholm, S. (2003), "Multi-grounded theory: adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory", Proceedings from European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management (ECRM 2003), Reading, March 20-21.
8. Hedström, K. (2004), "Spr av datoriseringens värden: Effekter av IT i äldreomsorg (Traces of the Values of Computerization: Effects of IT in Elderly Care)", PhD thesis, IDA, Linköping University, Linköping.
9. Hedström, K. and Cronholm, S. (2002), "Actability evaluation: an exploratory study", in Grembergen, W. (Ed.), Information Systems Evaluation Management, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, pp. 208-17.
10. Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (1996), "The rationality of value choices in information systems development", Foundations of Information Systems, September 26.
11. Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. (2001), "Choosing between competing design ideals in information systems development", Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 75-90.
12. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999), "A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretative field studies in information system", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 67-94.
13. Kling, R. (1987), "Computerization as an ongoing social and political process", in Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (Eds), Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge, Avery, Aldershot, pp. 117-35.
14. Kling, R. and Iacono, S. (1996), "Computerization movements and tales of technological utopianism", in Kling, R. (Ed.), Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choice, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 85-105.
15. Kluckhohn, C. et al. (1951), "Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: an exploration in definition and classification", in Parsons, T. and Shils, E.A. (Eds), Toward a General Theory of Action: Theoretical Foundations for the Social Sciences, Harper & Row, New York, NY, pp. 388-433.
16. Latour, B. (1996), Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Law, J. (1992), "Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network ordering, strategy and heterogeneity", Systems Practice, No. 5, pp. 379-93.
19. Law, J. and Bijker, W. (1992), "Postscript: technology, stability and social theory", in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (Eds) (1994), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Socio-technical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 290-308.
20. McMaster, T., Vidgen, R. and Wastell, D. (1998), "Information system development and 'due process': the case of the Van Sant map", in Buch, N.J., Damsgaard, J., Eriksen, L.B., Iversen, J.H. and Nielsen, P.A. (Eds), Information Systems Research in Collaboration with Industry, Proceedings of the 21st Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS), Department of Computer Science, Aalborg University, Aalborg, pp. 593-606.
21. Mumford, E. (1981), Values, Technology and Work, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague/Boston, MA/London.
22. Orlikowski, W.J. and Gash, D.C. (1994), "Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations", ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Wilson, M. No. 2, pp. 174-207.
23. Rescher, N. (1969), Introduction to Value Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, NJ.
24. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. Walsham, G. (1995), "Interpretive case studies in IT research: nature and method", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 74-81.
26. Wilson, M. (2002), "Making nursing visible? Gender, technology and the care plan as script", Information Technology & People, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 139-58.
27. Wilson, M. and Howcraft, D. (2000), "The politics of IT evaluation: a social shaping perspective", in Orlikowski, W.J., Ang, S. and Weill, P. (Eds), Twenty-first International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, pp. 94-103.
28. Winner, L. (1999), "Do artifacts have politics?", in MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (Eds), The Social Shaping of Technology, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 28-40.
29. Yin, R.K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.