Inhibition of return lasts longer at repeatedly stimulated locations than at novel locations

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 896-901

  Chao, Hsuan Fu ^a   Yeh, Yei Yu ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847666807     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194016     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. BELOPOLSKY, A. V., THEEUWES, J., & KRAMER, A. F. (2005). Prioritization by transients in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 93-99.
2. BUCKOLZ, E., BOULOUGOURIS, A., O'DONNELL, C., & PRATT, J. (2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 207-225.
3. CASTEL, A., PRATT, J., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 970-981.
4. CHAO, H.-F., & YEH, Y.-Y. (2005). Location negative priming in identity discrimination relies on location repetition. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 789-801.
5. CHAO, H.-F., YEH, Y.-Y, & YANG, T.-Y. (2003). Interference and inhibition of distractors. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 361-377.
6. CHOU, W. L., & YEH, S. L. (2005, August). Dissociation of object- and space-based inhibition of return by working memory. Poster presented at the 28th European Conference on Visual Perception, La Coruña, Spain.
7. CHRISTIE, J., & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). Negative priming for spatial locations? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 24-38.
8. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
9. DESCHEPPER, B., & TREISMAN, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 27-47.
10. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
11. FUENTES, L. J., VIVAS, A. B., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). Inhibitory mechanisms of attentional networks: Spatial and semantic inhibitory processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1114-1126.
12. GRISON, S., & STRAYER, D. L. (2001). Negative priming and perceptual fluency: More than what meets the eye. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1063-1071.
13. GRISON, S., TIPPER, S. P., & HEWITT, O. (2005). Long-term negative priming: Support for retrieval of prior attentional processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1199-1224.
14. HOUGHTON, G., & TIPPER, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego: Academic Press.
15. HULME, C., MAUGHAN, S., & BROWN, G. D. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 685-701.
16. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
17. KORENMAN, L. M., & PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F. (2004). The role of familiarity in episodic memory and metamemory for music. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 917-922.
18. LOULA, F., KOURTZI, Z., & SHIFFRAR, M. (2000). Surface segmentation cues influence negative priming for novel and familiar shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 929-944.
19. MALLEY, G. B., & STRAYER, D. L. (1995). Effect of stimulus repetition on positive and negative identity priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 657-667.
20. NAGAI, J.-I., & YOKOSAWA, K. (2003). Negative priming and stimulus familiarity: What causes opposite results? Memory & Cognition, 31, 369-379.
21. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. STRAYER, D. L., & GRISON, S. (1999). Negative identity priming is contingent on stimulus repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 24-38.
23. TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
24. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
25. TIPPER, S. P., GRISON, S., & KESSLER, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19-25.
26. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.
27. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
28. WEGER, U. W., & INHOFF, A. W. (2006). Semantic inhibition of return is the exception rather than the rule. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 244-253.
29. YEE, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127-153.