Outcomes in two post-acute non-inpatient rehabilitation settings

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 38-47

  Bode, Rita K ^a,b   Heinemann, Allen W ^a,b   Zahara, Donna ^a   Lovell, Linda ^a  

^a REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Patient referral; Services provided; Therapy outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REHABILITATION CARE; REHABILITATION CENTER; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AMBULATORY CARE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REHABILITATION CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33847657655     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1401-38     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. CARF. Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) Quality Forum White Paper. 1996. Available at: http://www.carf.org/Publications/ Online/WhitePaper.
2. Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-01744.
3. Jones L, Bagnall A. Spinal injuries centres (SICs) for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-03504.
4. Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, van Tulder M, Roine R, jauhiainen M, Hurri H, Koes B. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for fibromyalgia and musculoskeletal pain in working age adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-01349.
5. Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-03188.
6. Forster A, Young J, Langhorne P. Medical day hospital care for the elderly versus alternative forms of care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-00486.
7. Hillsdon M, Foster C, Thorogood M. Interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-02189.
8. Mottram P, Pitkala K, Lees C. Institutional versus at-home long term care for functionally dependent older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-02477.
9. Shepperd S, Iliffe S. Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-00713.
10. Ram FSF, Wedzicha JA, Wright J, Greenstone M. Hospital at home for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-02626.
11. Ashworth NL, Chad KE, Harrison EL, Reeder BA, Marshall SC. Home versus center based physical activity programs in older adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-02983.
12. Cameron ID, Handoll HHG, Finnegan TP, Madhok R, Langhorne P. Coordinated multidisciplinary approaches for inpatient rehabilitation of older patients with proximal femoral fractures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-00992.
13. Ward D, Severs M, Dean T, Brooks N. Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 2006. Accession number: 00075320-100000000-02226.
14. Gill HS. The changing nature of ambulatory rehabilitation programs and services in a managed care environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(12-S):SC10-15.
15. Morrison M. On the threshold of outcome management. Rehab Manage. 1997. As cited on: http://www.carf.org/Publications/Online/WhitePaper.
16. AHCPR. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation: Assessment, Referral and Patient Management. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services; 1995.
17. Heinemann AW, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Granger CV. Functional status and therapeutic intensity during inpatient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:315-325.
18. Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T. Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2537-2542.
19. Eagle DJ, Guyatt GH, Patterson C, Turpie I, Sackett B, Singer J. Effectiveness of a geriatric day hospital. Can Med Associates J. 1991;144:699-704.
20. Gladman J, Whynes D, Lincoln N. Cost comparison of domiciliary and hospital-based stroke rehabilitation. Age Ageing. 1994;23(3):241-245.
21. Hui E, Lum CM, Woo J, Or KH, Kay RL. Outcomes of elderly stroke patients: day hospital versus conventional medical management. Stroke. 1995;26(9): 1616-1619.
22. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;46:660-662.
23. Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke impairment assessment set: a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31:119-126.
24. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res. 1975;12:189-198.
25. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M, Tashman JS. A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ, ed. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. Baltimore MD: Brooks; 1987.
26. Chen CC, Heinemann AW, Granger CV, Linn RT. Functional gains and therapy intensities during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(11):1514-1523.
27. Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T. Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the "black box" of inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1901-1908.
28. Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Aging. 1983;12:166-170.
29. Schuling J, deHaan R, Limburg M, Groenier KH. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24:1173-1177.
30. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Hewer RL. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int J Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176-181.
31. Chong DK-H. Measurement of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in stroke. Stroke. 1995;26:1119-1122.
32. Jensen MP, Abresch RT, Carter GT. The reliability and validity of a self-report version of the FIM instrument in persons with neuromuscular disease and chronic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(1):116-122.
33. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwan J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Sci Med. 1981;15:221-229.
34. Ebrahim S, Barer D, Nouri F. Use of the Nottingham Health Profile with patients after a stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;30:166-169.
35. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale). Am J Prev Med. 1994;10:77-84.
36. Stuifbergen A, Seraphine A, Roberts G. An explanatory model of health promotion and quality of life in chronic illness. Nurs Res. 2000;49(3):122-129.
37. Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49:71-75.
38. Pavot W, Diener E, Colvin CR, Sandvik E. Further examination of the Satisfaction with Life Scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. J Pers Assess. 1991;57:149-161.
39. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 1982.
40. Linacre JM. WINSTEPS: Rasch Computer Program. Chicago, IL: MESA Press; 2004.
41. SPSS. Statistical Program for the Social Sciences, version 13.1. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2004.
42. Kilgore K. Measuring outcomes in the postacute continuum. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(12-S):SC21-26.