Who's guarding the henhouse? Ramifications of the Fox study

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 48-50

  Spike, Jeffrey P ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CREDENTIALING; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL; ETHICS CONSULTATION; HUMANS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847649536     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160601109648     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. 1998. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: The report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Glenview, IL: ASBH.
2. Fletcher, J. C., and E. M. Spencer. 1997. Ethics services in healthcare organizations. In Introduction to clinical ethics, 3rd edition, ed. J. C. Fletcher, P. A. Lombardo, M. F. Marshall, and F. G. Miller, 257-285. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.
3. Fox, E., S. Myers, and R. A. Pearlman. 2007. Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics 7(2): 13-25.
4. Spike, J. P., and J. Greenlaw. 2000. Ethics consultation: High ideals or unrealistic expectations? Annals of Internal Medicine 133(1): 55-57.