Support vector ordinal regression

Neural Computation

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 792-815

  Chu, Wei ^a   Keerthi, S Sathiya ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b YAHOO RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LOGISTIC MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 33847626350     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.3.792     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chu, W., & Keerthi, S. S. (2005). New approaches to support vector ordinal regression (Tech. Rep.). Burbank, CA: Yahoo! Research Labs.
2. Crammer, K., & Singer, Y. (2002). Pranking with ranking. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 14 (pp. 641-647). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Frank, E., & M. Hall, M. (2001). A simple approach to ordinal classification. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 145-165). Berlin: Springer.
4. Har-Peled, S., Roth, D., & Zimak D. (2002). Constraint classification: A new approach to multiclass classification and ranking. In S. Becker, S. Thrün, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 15 (pp. 785-792). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., & Obermayer, K. (2000). Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. In P. J. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, D. Schuumans, & A. J. Smola (Eds.), Advances in large margin classifiers (pp. 115-132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Hersh, W., Buckley, C., Leone, T., & Hickam D. (1994). Ohsumed: An interactive retrieval evaluation and new large test collection for research. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM SIGIR Conference (pp. 192-201). Berlin: Springer.
7. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In C. Nédellec & C. Rouveirol (Eds.), Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 137-142). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8. Johnson, V. E., & Albert, J. H. (1999). Ordinal data modeling (Statistics for social science and public policy). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
9. Keerthi, S. S., & Gilbert, E. G. (2002). Convergence of a generalized SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Machine. Learning, 46, 351-360.
10. Keerthi, S. S., Shevade, S. K., Bhattacharyya, C., & Murthy, K. R. K. (2001). Improvements to Platt's SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Computation, 13, 637-649.
11. Kramer, S., Widmer, G., Pfahringer, B., & DeGroeve, M. (2001). Prediction of ordinal classes using regression trees. Fundamenta informaticae, 47, 1-13.
12. McCallum, A. (1998). Rainbow. Available online at http://www.cs.umass. edu/ ~mccallum/bow/rainbow/.
13. Platt, J. C. (1999). Fast training of support vector machines using sequential minimal optimization. In B. Schölkopf, C. J. C. Burges, & A. J. Smola (1999). Advances in kernel methods-support vector learning (pp. 185-208). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Shashua, A., & Levin, A. (2003). Ranking with large margin principle: Two approaches. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, K. Obermayer (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 15 (pp. 937-944). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Srebro, N., Rennie, J. D. M., & Jaakkola, T. (2005). Maximum-margin matrix factorization. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, & Lo Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 17. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.