Patterns of response and nonresponse from teachers to traditional and web surveys

Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation

Volumn 8, Issue 22, 2003, Pages

  Mertler, Craig A ^a  

^a BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847617689     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15317714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Federation of Teachers (AFT), National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), & National Education Association (NEA) (1990). Standards for Teacher Competence in the Educational Assessment of Students. Retrieved April 21, 2003, from http://www.unl.edu/buros/article3.html
2. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). The Standards and classroom assessment research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451189)
3. Carbonaro, M. & Bainbridge, J. (2000). Design and development of a process for Web-based survey research. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 46, 392-394.
4. Dillman, D. A. (1998). Mail and other self-administered surveys in the 21st century: The beginning of a new era. Unpublished manuscript, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
5. Dillman, D. A. & Bowker, D. K. (2001). The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In U. Reips & M. Bosnjak (Eds.), Dimensions of Internet Science. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Publishers.
6. Heflich, D. A. & Rice, M. L. (1999, March). Online survey research: A venue for reflective conversation and professional development. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, San Antonio, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED432283)
7. Idleman, L. (2003, April). Comparing responses to mail and Web-based surveys. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Matz, C. M. (1999). Administration of Web versus paper surveys: Mode effects and response rates (Master's thesis, University of North Carolina). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439694)
9. Mertler, C. A. (2001, October). Lessons learned from the administration of a Web-based survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
10. Mertler, C. A. (2002a, April). Web-based surveys: Guiding lessons for their use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.
11. Mertler, C. A. (2002b). Demonstrating the potential for Web-based survey methodology with a case study. American Secondary Education, 30, 49-61.
12. Mertler, C. A. & Earley, M. A. (2003, April). A comparison of the psychometric qualities of surveys administered by Web and traditional methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
13. Montez, J. (2003, April). Web surveys as a source of nonresponse explication. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
14. Plake, B. S. (1993). Teacher assessment literacy: Teachers' competencies in the educational assessment of students. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 6(2), 21-27.
15. Saphore, R. B. (1999). A psychometric comparison of an electronic and classical survey instrument (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 3976.
16. Schillewaert, N., Langerak, F., & Duhamel, T. (1998). Non-probability sampling for WWW surveys: A comparison of methods. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40, 307-322.
17. Solomon, D. J. (2001). Conducting web-based surveys. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(19). Available online: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=19.