Diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1915-1921

  Sun, Zhonghua ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; ILIAC ARTERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; POPLITEAL ARTERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33847612005     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000248830.17550.50     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Fowkes FG, Housley E, Cawood EH, et al. Edinburgh Artery Study: prevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the general population. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20:384-392.
2. Hiatt WR. Medical treatment of peripheral arterial disease and claudication. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1608-1621.
3. Van Hoe L, Baert Al, Gryspeerdt S, et al. Supra-and juxtarenal aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: preoperative assessment with thin section spiral CT. Radiology 1996; 198:443-448.
4. Kaatee R, Beek FJ, de Lange EE, et al. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997; 205:121-127.
5. Lawrence JA, Kim D, Kent KC, et al. Lower extremity spiral CT angiography versus catheter angiography. Radiology 1995; 194:903-908.
6. Rieker O, Duber C, Neufang A, et al. CT angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for assessment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1133-1138.
7. Rieker O, Duber C, Schmiedt W, et al. Prospective comparison of CT angiography of the legs with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:269-276.
8. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Paik DS. Stair-step artifacts with single versus multidetector-row helical CT. Radiology 2000; 216:185-196.
9. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, et al. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 215:670-676.
10. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al. Multidetector row CT angiography of lower extremity arterial inflow and runoff: initial experience. Radiology 2001; 221:146-158.
11. Achenbach S, Ropers S, Pohle FK, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 x 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1978-1986.
12. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557.
13. Martin ML, Tay KH, Flak B, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of the aortoiliac system and lower extremities: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:1085-1091.
14. Ofer A, Nitechi SS, Linn S, et al. Multidetector CT angiography of peripheral vascular disease: a prospective comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180:719-724.
15. Edwards AJ, Wells IP, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row CT angiography of the lower limb arteries: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered techniques and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Clin Radiol 2005; 60:85-95.
16. Kalendar WA. Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. Munich: MCD Verlag, 2000.
17. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvanian Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group. Lancet 1997; 350:185-186.
18. Willmann JK, Wildermuth S, Pfammatter T, et al. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2003; 226:798-811.
19. Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Hausegger KA, et al. Multislice CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing? Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1681-1687.
20. Portugaller HR, Schoellnast H, Tauss J, et al. Semitransparent volume-rendered CT angiography for lesion display in aortoiliac arteriosclerotic disease J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:1023-1030.
21. Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, et al. Infrarenal aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: diagnostic performance of multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2004; 231:555-563.
22. Romano M, Mainenti PP, Imbriaco M, et al. Multidetector row CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement. Eur J Radiol 2004; 50:303-308.
23. Ota H, Takase K, Igarashi K, et al. MDCT compared with digital subtraction angiography for assessment of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: importance of reviewing cross-sectional images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182:201-209.
24. Fraioli F, Catalano C, Napoli A, et al. Low-dose multidetector-row CT angiography of the infra-renal aorta and lower extremity vessels: image quality and diagnostic accuracy in comparison with standard DSA. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:137-146.
25. Willmann JK, Baumert B, Schertler T, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2005; 236:1083-1093.
26. Schertler T, Wildermuth A, Alkadhi H, et al. Sixteen-detector row CT angiography for lower-leg arterial occlusive disease: analysis of section width. Radiology 2005; 237:649-656.
27. Kock MC, Adriaensen ME, Pattynama PM, et al. DSA versus multi-detector row CT angiography in peripheral arterial disease: randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2005; 237:727-737.
28. Adriaensen ME, Kock MC, van Sambeek MR, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: therapeutic confidence of CT versus digital subtraction angiography and effects on additional imaging recommendations. Radiology 2004; 233:385-391.
29. Rutherford RB, Becker GJ. Standards for evaluating and reporting the results of surgical and percutaneous therapy for peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1991; 2:169-174.
30. Singh H, Cardella JF, Cole PE, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for diagnostic arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14:S283-288.
31. Lilly MP, Reichman W, Sarazen AA, et al. Anatomic and clinical factors associated with complications of transfemoral arteriography. Ann Vasc Surg 1990; 4:264-269.
32. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992; 182:243-246.
33. Ubbink DT, Fidler M, Legemate DA. Interobserver variability in aortoiliac and femoropopliteal duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 2001; 33:540-545.
34. Bezooijen R, van den Bosch HC, Tielbeek AV, et al. Peripheral arterial disease: sensitivity-encoded multiposition MR angiography compared with intraarterial angiography and conventional multiposition MR angiography. Radiology 2004; 231:263-271.
35. Janka R, Fellner C, Wenkel E, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries including pedal vessels at 1.0 T: feasibility study with dedicated peripheral angiography coil. Radiology 2005; 235:319-326.
36. Huegli RW, Aschwanden M, Bongartz G, et al. Intraarterial MR angiography and DSA in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison. Radiology 2006; 239:901-908.
37. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993; 186:147-152.
38. Raptopoulos V, Rosen MP, Kent KC, et al. Sequential helical CT angiography of aortoiliac disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:1347-1354.
39. Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS, et al. Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1840-1845.
40. Zanzonico P, Rothenberg LN, Strauss HW. Radiation exposure of computed tomography and direct intracoronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47:1846-1948.
41. Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Semonsen KG, et al. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial disease: evaluation with MR angiography versus conventional angiography. Radiology 1998; 206:693-701.
42. Visser K, Hunink MG. Peripheral arterial disease: gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US-a meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 216:67-77.
43. Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. J R Stat Soc 1998; 151:419-463.