Three-dimensional hysterosonography versus hysteroscopy for the detection of intracavitary uterine abnormalities

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-9

  Makris, N ^a   Kalmantis, K ^a   Skartados, N ^a   Papadimitriou, A ^a   Mantzaris, G ^a   Antsaklis, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Hysteroscopy; Hysterosonography; Intrauterine lesions; Three dimensional power Doppler; Three dimensional ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIUM POLYP; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROGRAPHY; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; UTERUS MALFORMATION; UTERUS MYOMA;

EID: 33847403599     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Widrich T., Bradley L.D., Mitchinson A.R., and Collins R.L. Comparison of saline infusion sonohysterography with office hysteroscopy for the examination of the endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174 (1996) 1327-1334
2. Vercellini P., Cortesi I., Oldanis S., Moschetta M., De Girgi, and Girgio Crosignani P. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography and outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy in the examination of patients with menorrhagia. Hum Reprod 12 (1997) 1768-1771
3. Bonilla-Musoles F., and Raga F. Three-dimensional hysterosonography for the study of endometrial tumors: comparison with the conventional transvaginal sonography, hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy. Gynecol Oncol 65 (1997) 245-252
4. Bonilla-Musoles F., Raga F., Osborne N., Blanes J., and Coelho P. Three-dimensional hysterosonographic examination of the normal endometrium: comparison with transvaginal sonography and three-dimensional ultrasound. J Gynecol Surg 13 (1997) 101-107
5. La Torne R., and De Felice C. Transvaginal sonographic examination of endometrial polyps: a comparison with two-dimensional and three-dimensional contrast sonography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 26 (1999) 171-173
6. Salim R., Lee C., Davies A., Jolaoso B., Ofuasia E., and Jurkovic D. A comparative study of three-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids. Hum Reprod 20 1 (2005) 253-257
7. Weinraub Z., Maymon R., Shulman A., Bukorsky J., Kratochwil A., Lee A., et al. Three-dimensional saline contrast hysterosonography and surface rendering of uterine cavity abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol (1996) 277-282
8. Kurjak A., and Kupesic S. Three-dimensional ultrasound and Power Doppler in assessment of uterine and ovarian angiogenesis: a prospective study. Croat Med J 40 (1996) 51-58
9. Jurkovic D., Giepel A., Gurboeck K., Jauniaux E., Natucci M., and Campbelle S. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5 (1995) 233-237
10. Balen F.G., Allen C.M., Gardener J.G., Siddle N.C., and Lee S.W.R. Three-dimensional reconstruction of ultrasound images of the uterine cavity. Br J Radiol 66 (1993) 580-591
11. Lev-Toaff A.S., Rawoal N.M., Kurtz A.B., Forssberg F., and Goldberg R. Three-dimensional ultrasound: a problem solving tool in complex gynecological cases. Radiology 201 (1996) 384
12. Sylvestre C., Child T.J., Tulandi T., and Lin S. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two and three dimensional sonohysterography in women within trauterine lesions. Fertil Steril 79 5 (2003) 1222-1225
13. Indman P.D. Many problems previously requiring major open surgery can now be treated hysteroscopically [editorial]. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3 1 (1995) 1-2
14. Julian T.M. Hysteroscopic complications. J Low Genit Tract Dis 6 (2002) 39-47