Stress-strain analysis in the soil sample during laboratory testing

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 63-70

  Verveckaite, Neringa ^a   Amsiejus, Jonas ^a   Stragys, Vincentas ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Oedometer; Shear box; Soil strength; Stress strain distribution; Triaxial test

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; PLASTIC DEFORMATION; STRAIN; STRENGTH OF MATERIALS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

LABORATORY TESTING; OEDOMETERS; SHEAR BOX; SOIL STRENGTH; STRESS-STRAIN DISTRIBUTION; TRIAXIAL TESTS;

SOIL MECHANICS;

EID: 33847384568     PISSN: 13923730     EISSN: 18223605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13923730.2007.9636420     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. SHENG, D., WESTERBERG, B., MATTSSON, H., and AXELSSON, K., 1997. Effects of end restraint and strain rate in triaxial tests. Computers and Geotechnics, 21(3):163–182.
2. AL-CHALABI, M., and HUANG, C. L., 1974. Stress distribution within circular cylinders in compression. International Journal of Rock and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 11(2):45–56.
3. DONG, J., and NAKAMURA, K., Anisotropic deformation and strength characteristics of gravels in large-scale plane strain and triaxial compression tests. Proc of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Sept6–12, Hamburg. pp. 81–84. 1997
4. LA ROCHELLE, P., LEROUEIL, S., TRAK, B., BLAIS-LEROUX, L., and TAVENAS, F., 1988. “ Observational approach to membrane and area corrections in triaxial tests ”. In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock. ASTM STP 977 Edited by:Donaghe, R. T., Chaney, R. C., and Silver, M. L., 715–731. Philadelphia
5. SAUSSUS, D. R., FROST, D., and ASHMAWY, A. K., 2000. Variations in membrane contact patterns of reconstituted sand specimens. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 23(4) Dec:522–531.
6. HEAD, K. H., 1986. Manual of soil laboratory testing. Vol 3:Effective stress tests 743–1238. London
7. LADE, P. V., and WASIF, U., 1988. “ Effects of height-to-diameter ratio in triaxial specimens on the behaviour of cross-anisotropic sand ”. In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock. ASTM STP 977 Edited by:Donaghe, R. T., Chaney, R. C., and Silver, M. L., 706–714. Philadelphia
8. GOTO, S., and TATSUOKA, F., 1988. “ Effects of end conditions on triaxial compressive strength for cohesionless soil ”. In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock. ASTM STP 977 Edited by:Donaghe, R. T., Chaney, R. C., and Silver, M. L., 692–705. Philadelphia
9. BISHOP, A. W., and GREEN, G. E., 1965. The influences of end restraint on the compression strength of a cohesionless soil. Geotechnique, 15(3):243–265.
10. RAJU, V. S., SADASIVAN, S. K., and VENKATARAMAN, M., 1972. Use of lubricated and conventional end platens in triaxial tests on sands. Soils and Foundations, 12(4):35–43.
11. TATSUOKA, F., MOLENKAMP, F., TORII, T., and HINO, T., 1984. Behaviour of lubrication layers of platens in elements tests. Soils and Foundations, 24(1):113–128.
12. HETTLER, A., and GUDEHUS, G., 1985. Discussion. Soils and Foundations, 25 (3):140
13. UENG, T.-S., TZOU, Y.-M., and LEE, C.-J., 1988. “ The effect of end restraint on volume change and particle breakage of sands in triaxial tests ”. In Advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock. ASTM STP 977 Edited by:Donaghe, R. T., Chaney, R. C., and Silver, M. L., 679–691. Philadelphia
14. AIREY, D. W., 1991. Finite element analyses of triaxial tests with different end and drainage conditions. Proc of the 7th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics. 1991, Balkema, Rotterdam. Vol. 1, pp. 225–230.
15. JEREMIC, B., YANG, Z., and STURE, S., 2004. Numerical assessment of the influence of end conditions on constitutive behaviour of geomaterials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 130(6) June:741–745.
16. SUN, H., CHEN, J. F., and GE, X. R., 2004. Deformation characteristic of silty clay subjected to triaxial loading by computerised tomography. Geotechnique, 54(5):307–314.
17. OTANI, J., MUKUNOKI, T., and YOSHIMURA, M., 2001. Development of new triaxial compression test apparatus for geomaterials on industrial X-ray CT scanner. Proc of the 15th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Aug27–312001, Istanbul. pp. 231–234.
18. JANUSKEVICIUS, C. K., and VEY, E., 1965. Stress and strains in triaxial specimens. Instruments and apparatus for soil and rock mechanics, ASTM special technical publication No 392 169Philadelphia:American Society for Testing and Materials.
19. BALEVICIUS, R., DZIUGYS, A, and KACIANAUSKAS, R., 2004. Discrete element method and its application to the analysis of penetration into granular media. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 11(2):3–14.
20. VARDOULAKIS, I., and DRESCHER, A., 1985. Behaviour of granular soil specimens in the triaxial compression test. Developments in soil mechanics and foundation engineering, 281Elsevier.
21. MECSI, J., 2005. Alteration of soil stress/strain condition in the surrounding of the base of pile. Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geotechnics. June19–242005, Torino. pp. 515–523.
22. ALLERSMA, H. G. B., “ Optical analysis of stress and strain in shear zones ”. Available at http://geo.citg.tudelft.nl/allersma /allersma2.pdf (Accessed:2005, February)
23. ALIKONIS, A., AMŠIEJUS, J., and STRAGYS, V., 1999. Improvement of shear box apparatus and methodology of test. Proc of the 12th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. June7–101999, Amsterdam. pp. 1053–1057.
24. AMŠIEJUS, J. 2000. Determination design values of soil strength parameters (Grunto stiprumo rodikliu skaičiuojamuju reikšmiu nustatymas), 48 Vilnius:Technika. Summary of PhD thesis(in Lithuanian).
25. AMŠIEJUS, J., 2000. Analysis of methods for determining soil shear strength design. Statyba (Civil Engineering), 6 (2):120–127. (in Lithuanian)