NASA - Has its biological groundwork for a trip to Mars improved?

FASEB Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 643-646

  Haddy, Francis J ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Deep space; Life sciences; Mission; Planet earth; US Space Program

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ASTRONOMY; BIOMEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SPACE FLIGHT;

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; EXTRATERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT; MARS; SPACE FLIGHT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 33847376077     PISSN: 08926638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1096/fj.06-7262lsf     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Long, M. E. (2001) Surviving in space. Natl. Geogr. Mag. 199, 2-29
2. Krauss, R. W. (1991) NASA - a new course? A biologist's view of the Augustine Report. FASEB J. 5, 251
3. The Goldberg Report (1987) A strategy for space biology and medical science for the 1980s and 1990s, Committee on Space Biology and Medicine, Space Science Board, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, National Research Council
4. The Robbins Report (1988) Exploring the living universe: a strategy for Space Life Sciences, Life Sciences Strategic Planning Committee, NASA Advisory Council
5. Public Affairs (1990) NASA's space life sciences program set for major growth in decade ahead. FASEB J. 4, 3-4
6. Moore, F. D. (1992) Radiation burdens for humans on prolonged exomagnetospheric voyages. FASEB J. 6, 2338-2343
7. Reynolds, R. D. (1992) Effects of radiation on humans during prolonged spaceflight. FASEB J. 6, 2870-2871
8. Moore, F. D. (1992) Authors reply. FASEB J. 6, 2871