Should intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) procedure be abandoned?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Sentilhes, Loïc ^a   Sergent, Fabrice ^a   Marpeau, Loïc ^a   Descamps, Philippe ^b  

^a HÔPITAL CHARLES NICOLLE   (France)

^b ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

AGED; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; TREATMENT FAILURE; UTERINE PROLAPSE; VAGINA;

EID: 33847370216     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.039     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Mattox T.F., Moore S., Stanford E.J., and Mills B.B. Posterior vaginal sling experience in elderly patients yields poor results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) 1462-1466
2. Petros P.E. Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J 12 (2001) 296-303
3. Farnsworth B.N. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J 13 (2002) 4-8
4. Jelovsek J.E., Sokol A.I., Barber M.D., Paraiso M.F., and Walters M.D. Anatomic relationships of infracoccygeal sacropexy (posterior intravaginal slingplasty) trocar insertion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 2099-2104