The validity of a simple outcome measure to assess stuttering therapy

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 91-99

  Huinck, Wendy ^a   Rietveld, Toni ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Perceptions of Stuttering Inventory; Self assessment scale; Speech fluency; Stuttering therapy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; DOETINCHEM METHOD; EMOTION; FEMALE; FLUENCY DISORDER; GROUP THERAPY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION; STUTTERING; TECHNIQUE; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH THERAPY; STUTTERING;

EID: 33847369421     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000098342     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blood GW: Treatment efficacy in adults who stutter: review and recommendations. J Fluency Disord 1993;18:303-318.
2. Blood GW, Conture EG: Outcomes measurement issues in fluency disorders; in Frattali CM (ed): Measuring Outcomes in Speech-Language Pathology. New York, Thieme, 1998, pp 387-405.
3. Bloodstein O: A Handbook on Stuttering, ed 5. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 1995.
4. Boberg E, Kully D: Long-term results of an intensive treatment program for adults and adolescents who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1050-1059.
5. Conture EG: Treatment efficacy: stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:518-526.
6. Thomas C, Howell P: Assessing efficacy of stuttering treatments. J Fluency Disord 2001;26:311-333.
7. Conture EG, Guitar B: Evaluating efficacy of treatment of stuttering. J Fluency Disord 1993;18:253-287.
8. Conture EG: Evaluating childhood stuttering; in Curlee RF, Siegel GM (eds): Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. Needham Heights, Allyn & Bacon, 1996, pp 239-256.
9. Hasbrouck JM, Lowry F: Elimination of stuttering and maintenance of fluency by means of airflow, tension reduction and discriminative stimulus control procedures. J Fluency Disord 1989;14:165-183.
10. Ladouceur R, Auger J: Where have all the follow ups gone? Behav Ther 1980;3:10-11.
11. Wagaman JR, Miltneberger RG, Arndorfer RE: Analysis of a simplified treatment for stuttering in children. J Appl Behav Anal 1993;26:53-61.
12. Woolf G: The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance and expectancy. Br J Disord Commun 1967;2:158-171.
13. Brutten GJ: Stuttering: topography, assessment and behavior change strategies; in Eisenson J (ed): Stuttering: A Second Symposium. New York, Harper & Row, 1975, pp 226-234.
14. Brutten GJ, Janssen P: A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to the Speech Situations Checklist; in Proc 18th Congr Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr, Washington, 1981, pp 469-478.
15. Andrews G, Cutler J: Stuttering therapy: the relation between changes in symptom level and attitudes. J Speech Hear Disord 1974;39:312-319.
16. Lanyon RI: The measurement of stutter severity. J Speech Hear Res 1967;10:836-843.
17. Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM, Webster RL: Perceptual rating instrument for speech evaluation of stuttering treatment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:280-288.
18. O'Brian S, Packman A, Onslow M, O'Brian N: Measurement of stuttering in adults: comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47:1081-1087.
19. Huinck WJ, Peters HFM: Effectiviteitonderzoek bij stottertherapieën. Een observationale studie naar therapeutische effecten van drie verschillende therapievormen. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 2004.
20. Ingham JC, Riley G: Guidelines for documentation of treatment efficacy for young children who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998;41:753-770.
21. Kully D, Langevin M: Intensive treatment for stuttering adolescents; in Curlee RF (ed): Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency, ed 2. New York, Thieme, 1999, pp 139-159.
22. Van Alphen W, Hoogerwerf N: Stotteren, helpt de Doetinchemse Methode? Een evaluatieonderzoek naar resultaten van stottertherapie volgens de Doetinchemse Methode. Stichting tot voorlichting over stotteren, 1984.
23. Boberg E, Kully D: Comprehensive Stuttering Program. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1985.
24. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;2:420-428.
25. Langevin M, Boberg E: Results of an intensive stuttering therapy program. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 1993;17:158-166.
26. Franken MC, Boves L, Peters HFM: Evaluation of Dutch Precision Fluency-Shaping Program; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 2nd World Congr Fluency Disord. San Francisco, Nijmegen University Press, 1997, pp 303-308.
27. Craig A: Relapse following treatment for stuttering: a critical review and correlative data. J Fluency Disord 1998;23:1-30.
28. Gardner RC, Neufeld RWJ: Use of the simple change score in correlation analyses. Educ Psychol Meas 1987;47:849-863.
29. Ingham RJ, Cordes: On watching a discipline shoot itself in the foot: some observations on current trends in stuttering; in Healey EC, Bernstein N, Ratner AK (eds): Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap. Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999, pp 211-230.