Sound sight: Seeing with ultrasound

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 23-35

  Büscher, Monika ^a   Jensen, Gloria ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Ethnomethodology; Palpable computing; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOWN SYNDROME; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS RISK; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANTHROPOLOGY, CULTURAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSES; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 33847352857     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1460458207073643     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Yoxen E. Seeing with sound: A study of the development of medical images. In Bijker W E, Hughes T P, Pinch T. eds The Social Construction of Technological Systems 281-303 Cambridge: MIT, 1987.
2. Kurjak A et al. Three-dimensional sonography in prenatal diagnosis: A luxury or a necessity? Journal of Perinatology 2000; 28 (3), 194-209.
3. Newman K. Fetal Positions: Individualism, Science, Visuality Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
4. Rapp R. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge, 2000.
5. Mills C. Technology, embodiment and abortion. internal Medicine 2005; 35; 427-428.
6. Fisk N M, Sepulveda W, Drysdale K et al. Fetal telemedicine: Six month pilot of real-time ultrasound and video consultation between the Isle of Wight and London. British Journal of Obstetric Gynaecology 1996; 103; 1092-1095.
7. Quintero R A, Muñoz H, Pommer R et al. Operative fetoscopy via telesurgery. Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecology 2002; 20, 390-391.
8. Lawton S, Timmins S. Stakeholders' experience of teledermatology in a nurse-led community clinic: A case study. Health Informatics Journal 2005; 11 (2); 129-140.
9. Pervasive Healthcare, http//www.pervasivehealthcare.dk/projects/, February 2006.
10. The PalCom project, http//www.ist-palcom.org/, February 2006.
11. Vonge Corry A, Gjerlufsen T, Wolff Olsen J. The Stone: Digital support for (un)common issues during pregnancy. In SHI2005, Proceedings of the 3rd Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics, 25-26 August, Aalborg University 15-19.
12. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity, 1967.
13. Suchman L Plans and Situated Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
14. Pilnick A, Fraser D, James D. Presenting and discussing nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in the UK. Midwifery 2004; 20; 82-93.
15. Nicolaides K H. The 11-13+6 Weeks Scan. London: Fetal Medicine Foundation, 2004.
16. Mitchell L M. Baby's First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.
17. Latour B. When things strike back: A possible contribution of 'science studies' to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology 2000; 51; 107-123.
18. Heritage J, Stivers T Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 49; 1501-1517.
19. Astraia clinical database, http://www.astraia.com/frameset.html, February 2006.
20. Luff P, Heath C, Kuzuoka H, Yamazaki K, Yamashita J. Handling documents and discriminating objects in hybrid spaces. In Proceedings of CHI 2006.
21. MacLean A, Carter K, Lovstrand L, Moran T. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issue with buttons.. In Proceedings of CHI 1990: 175-182.
22. Dourish P. Developing a reflective model of collaborative systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1995; 2 (1); 40-63.
23. Chalmers M, Galani, A. Seamful interweaving: Heterogeneity in the theory and design of interactive systems. In Proceedings of DIS 2004 243-252.
24. Ingstrup M, Hansen K M. A declarative approach to architectural reflection. In 5th IEEE/IFIP Working Conference on Software Architecture WICSA 2005.
25. Rimassa G, Greenwood D, Calisti M. Palpable computing and the role of agent technology. In Proceedings of Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV, 4th International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, CEEMAS 2005.
26. Bellotti V et al. Making sense of sensing Systems: Five questions for designers and researchers. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference 415-422.