Pollen morphology of the tribes Naucleeae and Hymenodictyeae (Rubiaceae - Cinchonoideae) and its phylogenetic significance

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 329-341

  Verellen, Jef ^a   Dessein, Steven ^a,c   Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G ^b   Smets, Erik ^a,d   Huysmans, Suzy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b BOTANIC GARDEN MEISE   (Belgium)

^c ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN BRANCH   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compound apertures; Endoapertures; Orbicule morphology; Palynology; Sexine ornamentation

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; MORPHOLOGY; ORNAMENTATION; PALYNOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS;

CINCHONOIDEAE; NAUCLEEAE; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 33847345589     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00604.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andersson L. 1995. Tribes and genera of the Cinchoneae complex (Rubiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 409-427.
2. Andersson L, Antonelli A. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae), its position in Cinchonoideae, and description of a new genus, Ciliosemina. Taxon 54: 17-28.
3. Andersson L, Persson C. 1991. Circumscription of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae) - a cladistic approach. Plant Systematics and Evolution 178: 65-94.
4. Andreasen K, Bremer B. 1996. Phylogeny of the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). In: Robbrecht E, Puff C, Smets E, eds. Second International Rubiaceae Conference, Proceedings Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 119-138.
5. Bremer B, Andreasen K, Olsson D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 383-397.
6. De Block P, Robbrecht E. 1998. Pollen morphology of the Pavetteae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae) and its taxonomic significance. Grana 37: 260-275.
7. Delprete PG. 1996. Evaluation of the tribes Chiococceae, Condamineeae and Catesbaeeae (Rubiaceae) based on morphological characters. In: Robbrecht E, Puff C, Smets E, eds. Second International Rubiaceae Conference, Proceedings Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 165-192.
8. Dessein S, Harwood R, Robbrecht E, Smets E. 2005b. Pollen of the Spermacoce (Rubiaceae) species from the Northern Territory of Australia: morphology and taxonomic signifi- cance. Australian Systematic Botany 18: 367-382.
9. Dessein S, Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Smets E. 2002. Pollen of African Spermacoce species (Rubiaceae): morphology and evolutionary aspects. Grana 41: 69-89.
10. Dessein S, Ochoterena H, De Block P, Lens F, Robbrecht E, Schols P, Smets E, Vinckier S, Huysmans S. 2005a. Palynological characters and their phylogenetic signal in Rubiaceae. Botanical Review 71: 354-414.
11. Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH, Barnett LC. 1990. Index Herbariorum. Part I: The herbaria of the world. Regnum Vegetabile 120, 8th edn. New York: New York Botanical Garden.
12. Huysmans S. 1993. De pollenmorfologie van de Coptosapelteae (Rubiaceae - Cinchonoideae). Master's Thesis, Institute of Botany and Microbiology, K.U. Leuven.
13. Huysmans S, Dessein S, Smets E, Robbrecht E. 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 127: 219-240.
14. Huysmans S, El-Ghazaly G, Nilsson S, Smets E. 1997. Systematic value of tapetal orbicules: a preliminary survey of the Cinchonoideae (Rubiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 815-826.
15. Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Delprete P, Smets E. 1999. Pollen morphological support for the Catesbaeeae-Chiococceae-Exostema-complex (Rubiaceae). Grana 38: 325-338.
16. Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Smets E. 1994. Are the genera Hallea and Mitragyna (Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae) pollen morphologically distinct? Blumea 39: 321-340.
17. Huysmans S, Robbrecht E, Smets E. 1998. A collapsed tribe revisited: pollen morphology of the Isertieae (Cinchonoideae- Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 104: 85- 113.
18. Johansson JM. 1992. Pollen morphology in Psychotria (Rubiaceae, Rubioideae, Psychotrieae) and its taxonomic significance. A preliminary survey. Opera Botanica 115: 5-71.
19. Leroy JF. 1975. Taxogénétique dans le genre Hallea sur la sous-tribu des Mitragyninae (Rubiaceae - Naucleeae). Adansonia Série 2 (15): 65-88.
20. Nilsson S, Praglowski J. 1992. Erdtman's handbook of palynology, 2nd edn. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
21. Punt W, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A. 1994. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Utrecht: LPP Foundation.
22. Razafimandimbison SG. 2002. A systematic revision of Breonia (Rubiaceae - Naucleeae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 1-37.
23. Razafimandimbison SG, Bremer B. 2001. Tribal delimitation of Naucleeae (Rubiaceae): inference from molecular and morphological data. Systematics and Geography of Plants 71: 515-538.
24. Razafimandimbison SG, Bremer B. 2002. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rbcL, and trnT-F) and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 89: 1027-1041.
25. Reitsma T. 1969. Size modifications of recent pollen grains under different treatments. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 69: 23-47.
26. Ridsdale CE. 1978. A revision of the tribe Naucleeae s.s. (Rubiaceae). Blumea 24: 307-366.
27. Rova JHE, Andersson L. 1995. A reevaluation of the tribes Hippotideae and Tammsieae (Rubiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 15: 269-284.
28. Rova JHE, Andersson L, Delprete PG, Albert VA. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae- Rondeletieae-Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 145-159.
29. Schols P, Dessein S, D'hondt C, Huysmans S, Smets E. 2002. Carnoy: a new digital measurement tool for palynology. Grana 41: 124-126.
30. Vinckier S, Huysmans S, Smets E. 2000. Morphology and ultrastructure of orbicules in the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 108: 151- 174.
31. Vinckier S, Smets E. 2002. Systematic importance of orbicule diversity in Gentianales. Grana 41: 158-182.