Selecting cases in cross-national political research

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-61

  Anckar, Dag ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847344347     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570701211159     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Agné, H. (2004). Democracy Reconsidered. Stockholm: University of Stockholm, Stockholm Studies in Politics, 104.
2. Anckar, C. (2004). Determinants of the Death Penalty. A Comparative Study of the World. London and New York: Routledge.
3. Anckar, C. (2005) Some Reflections on the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research. Paper, XIV Nordic Political Science Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland, August 11-13.2005.
4. Anckar, C., Eriksson, M. & Leskinen, J. (2002). Measuring Ethnic, Linguistic and Religious Fragmentation in the World. Åbo Akademi University, Department of Political Science, Occasional Papers Series, 18, 7-14.
5. Anckar, D. (1993a). Comparative Research in the Nordic Countries: Overcoming Ethnocentrism? Scandinavian Political Studies, 16, 107-126.
6. Anckar, D. (1993b). Nordiska förbundet för statskunskap som komparativistisk arena och aktör. Politiikka, 35, 173-186.
7. Anckar, D. (2004). Regime Choices in Microstates: The Cultural Constraint. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 42, 206-223.
8. Castles, F. G. (Ed.) (1993). Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
9. Collier, D. & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and Pitfalls. Selection Bias in Qualitative Research. World Politics, 49, 56-91.
10. Daalder, H. (1987). Countries in Comparative European Politics. European Journal of Political Research, 15, 3-21.
11. Dahl, R. A. & Tufte, E. (1973). Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12. Davidson, A. (1989). Two Models of Welfare. The Origins and Development of the Welfare State in Sweden and New Zealand, 1888-1988. Uppsala: Publications of the Political Science Association in Uppsala, Nr 108.
13. Denk, T. (2002). Komparativ metod - förståelse genom jämförelse. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
14. Dogan, M. & Kazancigil, A. (1994). Introduction. In M. Dogan & A. Kazancigil (Ed.s), Comparing Nations. Concepts, Strategies, Substance, pp. 1-13. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
15. Dolowitz, D. & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What From Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44, 343-357.
16. Faure, A. M. (1994). Some Methodological Problems in Comparative Politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 307-322.
17. Forrest, J. B. (1994). Asynchronic Comparisons. In M. Dogan & A. Kazancigil (Ed.s), Comparing Nations. Concepts, Strategies, Substance, pp. 260-296. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
18. Galton, F. (1889). On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions Applied to the Laws of Marriage and Descent. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18, 272.
19. Go, J. (2003). A Globalizing Constitutionalism? Views From the Postcolony, 1945-2000. International Sociology, 18, 71-95.
20. Hadenius, A. (1992). Democracy and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. th edition. London: Macmillan Press.
22. Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Policies in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
23. Holt, R. T. & Turner, J. E. (1970). The Methodology of Comparative Research. In R. T. Holt & J. E. Turner (Ed.s), The Methodology of Comparative Research, pp. 1-20. New York: The Free Press.
24. Isaksson, G-E. (1989). Resultatlös omlokalisering. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag.
25. Karvonen, L. (1981). "Med vårt västra grannland som förebild". Åbo: Meddelanden från Stiftelsens för Åbo Akademi forskningsinstitut, Nr 62.
26. Karvonen, L. (1994). Diffusionsproblemet i studiet av komparativ politik. Politiikka, 36, 109-115.
27. Keman, H. (2002). Comparing Democracies: Theories and Evidence. In H. Keman (Ed.), Comparative Democratic Politics, pp. 32-61. London: Sage Publications.
28. Landman, T. (2000). Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics. London: Routledge.
29. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. The American Political Science Review, 65, 682-693.
30. Lijphart, A. (1975). The Comparable-Cases Strategy in Comparative Research. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 158-177.
31. Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 52, 69-105.
32. Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York and London: Routledge.
33. rd edition. New York: Longman.
34. Martz, J. D. (1994). Comparing Similar Countries. In M. Dogan & A. Kazancigil (Ed.s), Comparing Nations. Concepts, Strategies, Substance, pp. 239-259. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
35. Meckstroth, T. (1975). "Most Different Systems" and "Most Similar Systems": A Study in the Logic of Comparative Inquiry. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 132-157.
36. Mould, W. B. (1974). On Getting Nothing for Something. A Note on Causal Models of Political Development. Comparative Political Studies, 7, 139-164.
37. Naroll, R. (1965). Galton's Problem: The Logic of Cross-Cultural Analysis. Social Research, 32, 428-451.
38. Nurmi, H. (1974). Causality and Complexity. Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis, Series B, Tom 131.
39. Page, E. C. (1990). British Political Science and Comparative Politics. Political Studies, 38, 438-452.
40. Peters, B. G. (1998). Comparative Politics. Theory and Methods. London: Macmillan Press.
41. Przeworski, A. & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
42. Ragin, C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43. Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44. Rose, R. (1991). Comparing Forms of Comparative Analysis. Political Studies, 39, 446-462.
45. Ruin, O. (1969). Political Science in Sweden in the Post-War Period. Scandinavian Political Studies, Yearbook Series, 4, 171-182.
46. Sanders, D. (1994). Methodological Considerations in Comparative Cross-National Research. International Social Science Journal, 46, 43-49.
47. Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and Miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3, 243-257.
48. Smith, T. (1978). A Comparative Study of French and British Decolonization. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20, 70-102.
49. Smithson, M. (1987). Fuzzy Set Analysis for Behavioural and Social Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Vanhanen, T. (2003). Democratization. A Comparative Analysis of 170 Countries. London and New York: Routledge.
51. Zelditch, M. Jr. (1971). Intelligible Comparisons. In I. Valier (Ed.). Comparative Methods in Sociology, pp. 267-307. Berkeley: University of California Press.