Reducing the variability of neural responses: A computational theory of spike-timing-dependent plasticity

Neural Computation

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 371-403

  Bohte, Sander M ^a   Mozer, Michael C ^b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847336412     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.371     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, L., & Gerstner, W. (2004). Homeostasis and learning through spike-timing dependent plasticity. In D. Hansel, C. Chow, B. Gutkin, & C. Meunier (Eds.), Methods and models in neurophysics. In Proceedings of the Les Hauches Summer School 2003. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2. Bell, C. C., Han, V. Z., Sugawara, Y., & Grant, K. (1997). Synaptic plasticity in a cerebellum-like structure depends on temporal order. Nature., 387, 278-281.
3. Bell, A., & Parra, L. (2005). Maximising sensitivity in a spiking network. In L. Saul, Y. Weiss, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 17 (pp. 121-128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bi, G.-Q. (2002). Spatiotemporal specificity of synaptic plasticity: Cellular rules and mechanisms. Biol. Cybern., 87, 319-332.
5. Bi, G.-Q., & Poo, M.-M. (1998). Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: Dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci., 18(24), 10464-10472.
6. Bi, G.-Q., & Poo, M.-M. (2001). Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 24, 139-166.
7. Burkitt, A., Meffin, H., & Grayden, D. (2004). Spike timing-dependent plasticity: The relationship to rate-based learning for models with weight dynamics determined by a stable fixed-point. Neural Computation, 16(5), 885-940.
8. Chechik, C. (2003). Spike-timing-dependent plascticity and relevant mutual information maximization. Neural Computation, 15, 1481-1510.
9. Dan, Y., & Poo, M.-M. (2004). Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron, 44, 23-30.
10. Dayan, P. (2002). Matters temporal. Trends in Cognitive. Sciences, 6(3), 105-106.
11. Dayan, P., & Häusser, M. (2004). Plasticity kernels and temporal statistics. In S. Thrun, L. Saul, & B. Schölkopf (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 16. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Debanne, D., Gähwiler, B., & Thompson, S. (1998). Long-term synaptic plasticity between pairs of individual CA3 pyramidal cells in rat hippocampal slice cultures. J. Physiol., 507, 237-247.
13. Feldman, D. (2000). Timing-based LTP and LTD at vertical inputs to layer II/III pyramidal cells in rat barrel cortex. Neuron, 27, 45-56.
14. Froemke, R., & Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature, 416, 433-438.
15. Gerstner, W. (2001). A framework for spiking neuron models: The spike response model. In F. Moss & S. Gielen (Eds.), The handbook of biological physics, (vol 4, pp. 469-516). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Gerstner, W., Kempter, R., van Hemmen, J. L., & Wagner, H. (1996). A neural learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding. Nature, 383, 76-78.
17. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. (2002). Spiking neuron models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Hahnloser, R. H. R., Sarpeshkar, R., Mahowald, M. A., Douglas, R. J., & Seung, H. S. (2000). Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit. Nature, 405, 947-951.
19. Hennion, P. E. (1962). Algorithm 84: Simpson's integration. Communications of the ACM, 5(4), 208.
20. Herrmann, A., & Gerstner, W. (2001). Noise and the PSTH response to current transients: I. General theory and application to the integrate-and-fire neuron. J. Camp. Neurosci., 11, 135-151.
21. Hopfield, J., & Brody, C. (2004). Learning rules and network repair in spike-timing-based computation. PNAS, 101(1), 337-342.
22. Izhikevich, E., & Desai, N. (2003). Relating STDP to BCM. Neural Computation, 15, 1511-1523.
23. Jolivet, R., Lewis, T., & Gerstner, W. (2003). The spike response model: A framework to predict neuronal spike trains. In O. Kaynak, E. Alpaydin, E. Oja, & L. Yu (Eds.), Proc. Joint International Conference. ICANN/ICONIP 2003 (pp. 846-853). Berlin: Springer.
24. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J., & Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of neural science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. Karmarkar, U., Najarian, M., & Buonomano, D. (2002). Mechanisms and significance of spike-timing dependent plasticity. Biol. Cybern., 87, 373-382.
26. Kempter, R., Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. (1999). Hebbian learning and spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. E, 59(4), 4498-4514.
27. Kempter, R., Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. (2001). Intrinsic stabilization of output rates by spike-based Hebbian learning. Neural Computation, 13, 2709-2742.
28. Kepecs, A., van Rossum, M., Song, S., & Tegner, J. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity: Common themes and divergent vistas. Biol. Cybern., 87, 446-458.
29. Legenstein, R., Naeger, C., & Maass, W. (2005). What can a neuron learn with spike-timing-dependent plasticity? Neural Computation, 17, 2337-2382.
30. Linsker, R. (1989). How to generate ordered maps by maximizing the mutual information between input and output signals. Neural Computation, 1, 402-411.
31. Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., & Sakmann, B. (1997). Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APS and EPSPS. Science, 275, 213-215.
32. Nishiyama, M., Hong, K., Mikoshiba, K., Poo, M.-M., & Kato, K. (2000). Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification. Nature, 408, 584-588.
33. Paninski, L., Pillow, J., & Simoncelli, E. (2005). Comparing integrate-and-fire models estimated using intracellular and extracellular data. Neurocomputing, 65-66, 379-385.
34. Pfister, J.-P., Toyoizumi, T., Barber, D., & Gerstner, W. (2006). Optimal spike-timing dependent plasticity for precise action potential firing. Neural Computation, 18, 1318-1348.
35. Porr, B., & Wörgötter, F. (2003). Isotropic sequence order learning. Neural Computation, 15(4), 831-864.
36. Rao, R., & Sejnowski, T. (1999). Predictive sequence learning in recurrent neocortical circuits. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, & K. Müller (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 12 (pp. 164-170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Rao, R., & Sejnowski, T. (2001). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity as temporal difference learning. Neural Computation, 13, 2221-2237.
38. Roberts, P., & Bell, C. (2002). Spike timing dependent synaptic plasticity in biological systems. Biol. Cybern., 87, 392-403.
39. Saudargiene, A., Porr, B., & Wörgötter, F. (2004). How the shape of pre- and postsynaptic signals can influence STOP: A biophysical model. Neural Computation, 16, 595-625.
40. Senn, W., Markram, H., & Tsodyks, M. (2000). An algorithm for modifying neurotransmitter release probability based on pre- and postsynaptic spike timing. Neural Computation, 13, 35-67.
41. Shon, A., Rao, R., & Sejnowski, T. (2004). Motion detection and prediction through spike-timing dependent plasticity. Network: Comput. Neural Syst., 15, 179-198.
42. Sjöström, P., Turrigiano, G., & Nelson, S. (2001). Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synpatic plasticity. Neuron, 32, 1149-1164.
43. Song, S., Miller, K., & Abbott, L. (2000). Competitive Hebbian learning through spiketime -dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 919-926.
44. Song, S., Sjöström, P. J., Reigl, M., Nelson, S., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2005). Highly non-random features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e68.
45. Toyoizumi, T., Pfister, J.-P., Aihara, K., & Gerstner, W. (2005). Spike-timing dependent plasticity and mutual information maximization for a spiking neuron model. In L. Saul, Y. Weiss, & L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 17 (pp. 1409-1416). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. van Rossum, R., Bi, G.-Q., & Turrigiano, G. (2000). Stable Hebbian learning from spike time dependent plasticity. J. Neurosd., 20, 8812-8821.
47. Xie, X., & Seung, H. (2004). Learning in neural networks by reinforcement of irregular spiking. Physical Review E, 69, 041909.
48. Zhang, L., Tao, H., Holt, C., Harris, W., & Poo, M.-M. (1998). A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses. Nature, 395, 37-14.