Multidetector computed tomography in acute knee injuries: Assessment of cruciate ligaments with magnetic resonance imaging correlation

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 104-111

  Mustonen, A O T ^a,b   Koivikko, M P ^c   Haapamaki, V V ^c   Kiuru, M J ^c   Lamminen, A E ^c   Koskinen, S K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b ORTON ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Cruciate ligaments; Knee; MDCT; MRI

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION METHODS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY;

CRUCIATE LIGAMENT PATHOLOGY; CRUCIATE LIGAMENTS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (MDCT);

MEDICAL IMAGING;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KNEE; KNEE INJURY; KNEE LIGAMENT; LIGAMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; FEMALE; FINLAND; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; LIGAMENTS, ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33847329185     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850601045138     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bailey SM, Sarmandal P, Grant JM. A comparison of three methods of assessing inter-observer variation applied to measurement of the symphysis-fundal height. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989:96:1266-71.
2. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 1998;209:327-9.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
4. Buttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Rieder T. Noninvasive diagnosis of cruciate ligament damage with particular reference to computed tomography with arthrography. Am J Sports Med 1989;17:501-4.
5. European Commission. Optimizing radiation dose. In: Dixon A, editor. Radiation protection: 118 referral guidelines for imaging. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2001. p. 19-22.
6. Fayad LM, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK. Musculoskeletal imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: when is computed tomography the study of choice? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2005; 34:220-37.
7. Fischer SP, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD. Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73:2-10.
8. Grant JM. The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet 1991;337:215-8.
9. Gross ML, Grover JS, Bassett LW, Seeger LL, Finerman GA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clinical use to improve diagnostic accuracy. Am J Sports Med 1992;20:732-7.
10. Ha TP, Li KC, Beaulieu CF, Bergman G, Ch'en IY, Eller DJ, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament injury: fast spin-echo MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 217 examinations. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1215-9.
11. Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Mustonen AO, Koskinen SK. Multidetector computed tomography in acute joint fractures. Acta Radiol 2005;46:587-98.
12. Harris JH. Knee. In: Harris JH, Harris WH, editors. The radiology of emergency medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 815-37.
13. Ihara H. Double-contrast CT arthrography of the cruciate ligaments. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1991;65:477-87.
14. Irie K, Yamada T. Three-dimensional virtual computed tomography imaging for injured anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:93-5.
15. Lee W, Kim HS, Kim SJ, Kim HH, Chung JW, Kang HS, et al. CT arthrography and virtual arthroscopy in the diagnosis of the anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal abnormalities of the knee joint. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:47-54.
16. Nagel HD. Dose values from CT examinations. In: Nagel HD, editor. Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Hamburg; CTB Publications; 2002. p. 15-24.
17. Passariello R, Trecco F, De Paulis F, Bonanni G, Masciocchi C, Zobel BB. Computed tomography of the knee joint: technique of study and normal anatomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:1035-42.
18. Passariello R, Trecco F, De Paulis F, De Amicis R, Bonanni G, Masciocchi C. Computed tomography of the knee joint: clinical results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:1043-9.
19. Prickett WD, Ward SI, Matava MJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Sports Med 2001;31:997-1019.
20. Reiser M, Rupp N, Karpf PM, Feuerbach S, Anacker H. Evaluation of the cruciate ligaments by CT. Eur J Radiol 1981;1:9-15.
21. Stabler A, Glaser C, Reiser M. Musculoskeletal MR: knee. Eur Radiol 2000;10:230-41.
22. Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, Dubuc JE, Maldague B, Malghem J. Anterior cruciate ligament tears and associated meniscal lesions: assessment at dual-detector spiral CT arthrography. Radiology 2002; 223:403-9.
23. Vande Berg BC, Lecouvet FE, Poilvache P, Maldague B, Malghem J. Spiral CT arthrography of the knee: technique and value in the assessment of internal derangement of the knee. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1800-10.