A comparison of the technical sustainability of in situ stabilisation/solidification with disposal to landfill

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 141, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 430-440

  Harbottle, M J ^a   Al Tabbaa, A ^a   Evans, C W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b May Gurney Geotechnical Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Landfilling; Life cycle analysis; Multi criteria analysis; Stabilisation solidification; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; LAND FILL; LIFE CYCLE; WASTE DISPOSAL;

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; WASTE PRODUCTION;

SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL;

CONTAMINATION; LAND FILL; LIFE CYCLE; SOIL POLLUTION CONTROL; WASTE DISPOSAL;

LANDFILL; SOIL REMEDIATION; SOLIDIFICATION; STABILIZATION; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GAS WASTE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LANDFILL LEACHATE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTION TRANSPORT; SCORING SYSTEM; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REFUSE DISPOSAL;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33847324053     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.084     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Council of the European Union, Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26th April 1999 on the landfill of waste.
2. J. Vegter, J. Lowe, H. Kasamas (Eds.), Sustainable Management of Contaminated Land: An Overview, CLARINET Report, Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Germany, 2002.
3. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Characteristics of Sustainable Brownfields Projects, US Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA500-R-98-001, 1998.
4. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, A Sustainable Brownfields Model Framework, US Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA500-R-99-001, 1999.
5. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Brownfields Technology Primer: Requesting and Evaluating Proposals that Encourage Innovative Technologies for Investigation and Cleanup, US Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA542-R-01-005, 2001.
6. R.P. Bardos, C.P. Nathanail, A. Weenk, Assessing the Wider Environmental Value of Remediating Land Contamination: A Review, Environment Agency (England and Wales) R&D Technical Report P238, 2000.
7. Suèr P., Nilsson-Påledal S., and Norrman J. LCA for site remediation: a literature review. Soil Sediment Contam. 13 (2004) 415-425
8. Bardos R.P., Nathanail J., and Pope B. General principles for remedial approach selection. Land Contam. Reclam. 10 3 (2002) 137-160
9. Rivett M.O., Petts J., Butler B., and Martin I. Remediation of contaminated land and groundwater: experience in England and Wales. J. Environ. Manage. 65 (2002) 251-268
10. M.J. Harbottle, A. Al-Tabbaa, C.W. Evans, The technical sustainability of in-situ stabilisation/solidification, in: A. Al-Tabbaa, J. Stegemann, (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Stabilisation/Solidification Treatment and Remediation, Cambridge, UK, April 2005, Balkema, pp. 159-170.
11. R.P. Bardos, A. Lewis, S. Nortcliff, C. Matiotti, F. Marot, T. Sullivan, Review of Decision Support Tools for Contaminated Land Management and their Use in Europe, CLARINET Report, Umweltbundesamt GmbH, Germany, 2002.
12. T.M. Sullivan, P.D. Moskowitz, M. Gitten, S. Schaffer, Environmental Decision Support Software: Identification and Preliminary Review, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report No. BNL-64384, US, 1997.
13. M. Postle, T. Fenn, A. Grosso, J. Steeds, Cost-benefit Analysis for Remediation of Land Contamination, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency/Environment Agency (England and Wales) R&D Technical Report P316, 1999.
14. Page C.A., Diamond M.L., Campbell M., and McKenna S. Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: case study. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18 4 (1999) 801-810
15. Blanc A., Métivier-Pignon H., Gourdon R., and Rousseaux P. Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur. Adv. Environ. Res. 8 (1999) 613-627
16. Netherlands Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Circular on target values and intervention values for soil remediation. http://www2.vrom.nl/Docs/internationaal/S_I2000.pdf and http://www2.vrom.nl/Docs/internationaal/annexS_I2000.pdf, 2000.
17. Harris F. Modern Construction and Ground Engineering Equipment and Methods (1994), Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow
18. In: Hewlett P.C. (Ed). Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete. 4th ed. (1998), Arnold, London
19. UK Office of National Statistics, Electricity generation: by fuel used, EU comparison, 2001. Social Trends 34 (Office of National Statistics publication, 2001) Table 11.13.
20. Environment Agency (England and Wales), The Contaminated Land Exposure Assessment (CLEA) Model: Technical Basis and Algorithms, Environment Agency (England and Wales) R&D Report CLR10, 2000.
21. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Ecological Benchmark Tool. http://rais.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/eco/ECO_select.
22. UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, 2000 data. http://www.naei.org.uk.
23. R.G. Gregory, A.G. Gillett, D. Bradley, Methane Emissions from Landfill Sites in the UK, Report by Land Quality Management for the UK Government Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2003.
24. US Environmental Protection Agency, Greenhouse Gases and Global Warming Potential Values, Excerpt from the Inventory of US Greenhouse Emission and Sinks: 1990-2000. US Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, Office of Atmospheric Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2002.
25. A.J. Wills, D.W. Churcher, How much noise do you make? A guide to assessing and managing noise on construction sites, CIRIA Project Report 70, London, 1999.
26. Bagchi A. Design, Construction and Monitoring of Landfills (1994), Wiley, New York
27. M.J. Board, J.M. Reid, D.S.J. Fox, D.I. Grant, The effects of age on cement stabilised/solidified contaminated material, TRL Report 451, Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK, 2000.
28. Board M.J., Reid J.M., Fox D.S.J., and Grant D.I. The long-term assessment of a cement stabilised/solidified contaminated made ground for use as a road construction material. Land Contam. Reclam. 8 2 (2000) 75-85
29. Al-Tabbaa A., and Boes N. Pilot in situ auger mixing treatment of a contaminated site. Part 4. Performance at 5 years. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.: Geotech. Eng. 155 3 (2002) 187-202
30. Al-Tabbaa A., Perera A.S.R., and Chitambira B. Measured and predicted long-term behaviour of stabilised/solidified contaminated ground. Proceedings of the Eighth International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil. Ghent, Belgium (2003) C-2050
31. B. Chitambira, Accelerated ageing of cement stabilised/solidified contaminated soils with elevated temperatures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2004.
32. A.S.R. Perera, The use of carbon dioxide in the accelerated ageing of stabilised/solidified contaminated soils, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2005.