Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Judgment: An Imaginary Divide

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1012-

  Karthikeyan, Ganesan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOPLASTY; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SKILL; UNCERTAINTY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT;

EID: 33847323988     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.011     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Pereira A.C., Lopes N.H.M., Soares P.R., et al. Clinical judgment and treatment options in stable multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the one-year follow-up of the MASS II (Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study II). J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 948-953
2. Ben-Yehuda O. Physician judgment in cardiology: the art of medicine lives on. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 954-955
3. Newman T.B. The power of stories over statistics. BMJ 327 (2003) 1424-1427
4. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131