Transformative considerations: Inclusion and social justice

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 86-90

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Axiolology; Ethics; Transformation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847289220     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: 15570878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214006298058     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Evaluation Association (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved November 15, 2006, from http://eval.org/ Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp
2. House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Ludema, J. D., Cooperrider, D. L., & Barrett, F. J. (2006). Appreciative inquiry: The power of the unconditional positive question. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research (concise paperback ed., pp. 155-165). London: Sage.
4. Mertens, D. M. (in press). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford.
5. Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Simons, H. (2006). Ethics in evaluation. In I. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), The international handbook of evaluation (pp. 213-232). London: Sage.