Quality assessment of the results obtained by multivariate curve resolution analysis of multiple runs of gasoline blending processes

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 54-67

  Jaumot, Joaquim ^a   Menezes, José C ^b   Tauler, Romà ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^c DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY   (Spain)

Author keywords

Alternating least squares; Error propagation; Feasible bands; Multivariate curve resolution; Multiway; Resampling methods; Rotation ambiguities

Indexed keywords

BLENDING; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; QUALITY CONTROL;

ALTERNATING LEAST SQUARES; BLENDING PROCESS; ERROR PROPAGATION; FEASIBLE BAND; GASOLINE BLENDING; MULTIVARIATE CURVE RESOLUTION; MULTIWAY; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; RESAMPLING METHOD; ROTATION AMBIGUITY;

GASOLINE;

EID: 33847271786     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: 1099128X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.985     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Navea S, de Juan A, Tauler R. Modeling temperature-dependent protein structural transitions by combined near-IR and mid-IR spectroscopies and multivariate curve resolution. Anal. Chem. 2003; 75: 5592-5601.
2. Jaumot J, Escaja N, Gargallo R, Gonzalez C, Pedroso E, Tauler R. Multivariate curve resolution: a powerful tool for the analysis of conformational transitions in nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: e92/1-e92/10.
3. Tauler R, Smilde A, Kowalski B. Selectivity, local rank, 3-way data-analysis and ambiguity in multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemometrics 1995; 9: 31-58.
4. Amrhein M, Srinivasan B, Bonvin D, Schumacher MM. On the rank deficiency and rank augmentation of the spectral measurement matrix. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1996; 33: 17-33.
5. Tauler R. Calculation of maximum and minimum band boundaries of feasible solutions for species profiles obtained by multivariate curve resolution. J. Chemo-metrics 2001; 15: 627-646.
6. Jaumot J, Gargallo R, Tauler R. Noise propagation and error estimations in multivariate curve resolution alternating least squares using resampling methods. J. Chemometrics 2004; 18: 327-340.
7. Garrido M, Larrechi MS, Rius FX, Tauler R. Calculation of band boundaries of feasible solutions obtained by multivariate curve resolution alternating least squares of multiple runs of a reaction monitored by NIR spectroscopy. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 2005; 76: 111- 120.
8. Tauler R. Multivariate curve resolution applied to second order data. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1995; 30: 133-146.
9. Lawton WH, Sylvestre EA. Self modeling curve resolution. Technometrics. 1971; 13: 617-633.
10. Henry RC, Kim BM. Extension of self-modeling curve resolution to mixtures of more than 3 components.1. Finding the basic feasible region. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1990; 8: 205-216.
11. Gemperline PJ. Computation of the range of feasible solutions in self-modeling curve resolution algorithms. Anal. Chem. 1999; 71: 5398-5404.
12. Jaumot J, Gargallo R, de Juan A, Tauler R. A graphical user-friendly interface for MCR-ALS: a new tool for multivariate curve resolution in MATLAB. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 2005; 76: 101-110.
13. Van Benthem MH, Keenan MR, Haaland DM. Application of equality constraints on variables during alternating least squares procedures. J. Chemometrics 2002; 16: 613-622.
14. Bro R, Dejong S. A fast non-negativity-constrained least squares algorithm. J. Chemometrics 1997; 11: 393-401.
15. Lawson CL, Hanson RJ. Solving Least-Squares Problems (1st edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US, 1974.
16. Gans P. Data Fitting in the Chemical Sciences: By the Method of Least Squares (1st edn). Wiley: New York, NY, US, 1992.
17. Faber NM. Comment on a recently proposed resampling method. J. Chemometrics 2001; 15: 169-188.
18. Bijlsma S, Smilde AK. Estimating reaction rate constants from a two-step reaction: a comparison between two-way and three-way methods. J. Chemometrics 2000; 14: 541-560.
19. Massart DL, Buydens LMC, Vandegiste BGM. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics (1st edn). Data Handling in Science and Technology Series, 20. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.
20. Derks EPPA, Pastor MSS, Buydens LMC. Robustness analysis of radial base function and multilayered feedforward neural-network models. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1995; 28: 49-60.
21. Grams/AI TC.
22. Labview NI, Austin, TX, US.
23. MATLAB TM, Release 13, 2002, Natick, MA, US.
24. Savitzky A, Golay MJE. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 1964; 36: 1627-1639.
25. Multivariate Curve Resolution website [Online] Available: http://www.ub.es/gesq/mcr/mcr.htm [August 1st 2005].
26. Windig W, Guilment J. Interactive self-modeling mixture analysis. Anal. Chem. 1991; 63: 1425-1432.
27. dejuan A, VanderHeyden Y, Tauler R, Massart DL. Assessment of new constraints applied to the alternating least squares method. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1997; 346: 307-318.
28. IzquierdoRidorsa A, Saurina J, HernandezCassou S, Tauler R. Second-order multivariate curve resolution applied to rank-deficient data obtained from acid-base spectrophotometric titrations of mixtures of nucleic bases. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1997; 38: 183-196.
29. Manne R. On the resolution problem in hyphenated chromatography. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Sys. 1995; 27: 89-94.
30. Malinowski ER, Howery DG. Factor Analysis in Chemistry (3rd edn). Wiley: New York, NY, US, 2002.
31. Golub GH, Van Loan CF. Matrix Computations (3rd edn). John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, US, 1996.