Theoretical and conceptual frameworks for studying agent interaction and choice revelation in transportation studies

International Journal of Transport Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 17-47

  Hensher, David A ^a   Puckett, Sean M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GAME THEORY; MODEL; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS;

EID: 33847264345     PISSN: 03918440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arora, N. and Allenby, G. (1999) Measuring the influence of individual preference structures in group decision making, Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 476-487.
2. Bernheim, D. (1984) Rationalizable strategic behaviour, Econometrica, 52, 1007-1028.
3. Bhat, C. (2003) Econometric choice formulations: alternative model structures, estimations, techniques, and emerging directions, Resource paper prepared for the 8th IATBR Conference workshop on Developments in Discrete Choice Models, Switzerland, 10-15 August 2003.
4. Blume, L. and Durlauf, S. (2004) Equilibrium concepts for social interaction models, Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca.
5. Brewer, A. and Hensher, D. A. (2000) Distributed work and travel behaviour: the dynamics of interactive agency choices between employers and employees Transportation, 27 (1), 117-148.
6. Brock, W. A. and Durlauf, S.N. (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions, Review of Economic Studies, 68, 235-260.
7. Chopra, S. (2003) Designing the distribution network in a supply chain, Transportation Research E, 39, 123-140.
8. Dellaert, B., Prodigalidad, M. and Louviere, J. (1998) Family members' projections of each other's preference and influence: a two-stage conjoint approach, Marketing Letters, 9 (2), 135-145.
9. Fehr, E. and Fischbacher, U. (2002) Why social preferences matter - the impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation and incentives, The Economic Journal, 112, March, 1-33.
10. Freidman, D. and Sunder, S. (1994) Experimental Economics: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Gaviria, A. and Raphael, S. (2001) School-based peer effects and juvenile behaviour, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 257-268.
12. Gilboa, I. and Schmeidler, D. (1995) Case-based decision theory, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 605-639.
13. Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D. and Wakker, P. (2002) Utility in case-based decision theory, Journal of Economic Theory, 105, 483-502.
14. Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B. and Scheinkman, J. (1996) Crime and social interactions, Quarterly Review of Economics, 111, 507-548.
15. Golicic, S. L., Foggin, J. H. and Mentzer, J. T. (2003) Relationship magnitude and its role in interorganisational relationship structure, Journal of Business Logistics, 24 (1), 57-75.
16. Hensher, D. A. (2003), Models of Organisational and Agency Choices for Passenger and Freight-Related Travel Choices: Notions of Inter-Activity and Influence, Resource Paper prepared for the 8th IATBR Conference workshop on Models of organisational choices (freight and passenger), Switzerland, 10-15 August 2003.
17. Hensher, D. A. (2006) How do Respondents Handle Stated Choice Experiments? - attribute consideration under varying information load, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21, 861-878.
18. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. and Greene, W. (2005) Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Kahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk, Econometrica, 47 (2), 263-291.
20. Kooreman, P. and Soetevent, A. (2001) A discrete choice model with social interactions: an analysis of high school teen behaviour, Department of Economics, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
21. Manski, C. F. (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115-136.
22. McKelvey, R. and Palfrey, T. R. (1995) Quantal response equilibria in normal form games, Games and Economic Behavior (special issue on Experimental Game Theory), 10, 6-38.
23. McKelvey, R. and Palfrey, T. R. (1998), Quantal response equilibria in extensive form games, Experimental Economics, 1, 9-41.
24. Pearce, D. (1984) Rationalizable strategic behaviour and the problem of perfection, Econometrica, 52, 1029-1050.
25. Prelec, D. (1998) The probability weighting function, Econometrica, 66, 497-527.
26. Puckett, S. and Hensher, D. A. (2004) Design and Development of the Interactive Stated Choice experiment in a Two-Agent Setting, UGM Paper #3, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney.
27. Puckett, S., Hensher, D. A. and Battellino, H. (2006) The Adjustment of Supply Chains to New States: A qualitative assessment of decision relationships with special reference to congestion charging, (UGM Paper #5), International Journal of Transport Economics XXXIII, 3, October, 313-339.
28. Puckett, S. M. and Hensher, D. A. (in press) Behavioural responses of freight transporters and shippers to variable road user charging schemes in Pricing in Road Transport: A Multi-Disciplinary Perspective, edited by E. Verhoef, B. Van Wee, L. Steg and M. Bliemer, Edward Elgar.
29. Puckett, S., Hensher, D. A. and Rose, J. M. (2006) Moving beyond the Limitations of Stated Preference Methods in the Analysis of interactions: Stated Endogenous Attribute Level (SEAL) Analysis, Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney.
30. Radner, R. (1996)Bounded Rationality, Indeterminacy, and the Theory of the Firm. Economic Journa,l 106 (September), 1360-1373.
31. Rose, J. and Hensher, D. A. (2004) Modelling agent interdependency in group decision making, Transportation Research E, 40(1), 63-79.
32. Rubinstein, A. (1998) Modeling Bounded Rationality, MIT Press, Cambridge.
33. Sakovics, J. (2001) Games of incomplete information without common knowledge priors, Theory and Decision, 50 (4), 347-366.
34. Starmer, C. (2000) Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVIII, 332-382.
35. Swait, J. and Adamowicz, W. (2001) The influence of task complexity on consumer choice: a latent class model of decision strategy switching, Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 135-148.
36. Train, K., Louviere, J., Hensher, D., Brownstone, D., Waldman, D., Greene, W., Ben Akiva M., DeShazo, J., Carson, R., Cameron, T. and Bhat, C. (2005) Endogeneity in discrete choice models, to appear in Marketing Letters, Vol. 16, No. 3-4, December, 255-265.
37. Tversky, A. and Wakker, P. (1995) Risk attitudes and decision weights. Econometrica 63 (6), 1255-1280.