Chinese web page classification using noise-tolerant support vector machines

Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering, IEEE NLP-KE'05

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 785-790

  Zou, Jia Qi ^a   Chen, Guo Long ^a   Guo, Wen Zhong ^a  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

K nearest neighbor(KNN); Noise tolerant; Support vector machines(SVM); Web classification

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; WEBSITES;

K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (KNN); NOISY TRAINING DATA; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM); WEB CLASSIFICATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33847256386     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NLPKE.2005.1598843     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Y Yang,X Lin, A re-examination of text categorization methods. In: The 22nd Annual Int'l ACM SIGIR Conf on Research and Development in Information Retrieval,New York:ACM Press, 1999,42-49.
2. Y Yang,C G Chute. An example-based mapping method for text categorization and retrieval.ACM Trans on Information Systems,1994,12(3):252-277.
3. D D Lewis. Naïve (Bayers) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: The 10th European Conf on Machine Learning (ECML98),New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998,4-15.
4. E Wiener A neural network approach to topic spotting. The 4th Annual Symp on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval(SDAIR 95),Las Vegas,NV,1995.
5. [5]T Joachims,Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features. In :The 10th European Conf on Machine Learning (EMCL-98).Berlin:Springer, 1998.137-142.
6. Galavotti, L., Sebastiani, F., & Simi, M. (2000). Feature selection and negative evidence in automated text categorization. Proc. of KDD-00.,2000
7. Y. Yang and J.P. Pedersen, A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization, in the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-97), pp.412-420, 1997.
8. G. Salton and C. Buckley, Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval,Information Processing and Management, vol.24(5), pp.513-523, 1988.
9. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik. 1995. Support vector networks. Machine learning, 20:273-297.
10. John C P. Fast Training of support vector machines using Se-quential Minimal Optimization. In Scholkopf B. et al (ed.), Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning,Cam-bridge, MA,MITPress,1999,185-208
11. Keerthi SS,etal. Improvements to Platt's SMO Algorithm for SVM Classie rDesign,TR CD-99-14, Dept.of Mecha. and Prod.Engin. National Uni. of Singapore,1999
12. Boser B,Guyon I,Vapnik V. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers [A]. Haussler D. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory [C].ACM Press,1992.144-152.
13. T. Joachims. 1999. Making large-Scales SVM learning Pracical. Advances in Kernel Methods -Support Vector Learning. B. Scholkopf, C. Burges and A. Smola (ed.), MIT Press.
14. Heisele, B., Ho, P. and Poggio, T., Face Recognition with Support Vector Machines, Global versus Component-based Approach. Proc. of ICCV'01, VOL-II, (2001) 688-694.
15. Ke Hai-Xin,Zhang, Xue-Gong, Editing support vector machines. In: Processings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Washington,USA,2001,2:1464-1467
16. Gokhan H. Bakir, Léon Bottou, Jason Weston, Breaking SVM Complexity with Cross- training,In: the 18th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS-2004), 2004