Snapshot: A rapid technique for driving a selective global illumination renderer

13th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision 2005, WSCG'2005 - In Co-operation with EUROGRAPHICS, Full Papers

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 81-84

  Longhurst, Peter ^a   Debattista, Kurt ^a   Chalmers, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

High fidelity graphics; Human visual perception; Interactive rendering of dynamic scenes; Selective rendering

Indexed keywords

A-FRAMES; COMPLEX SCENES; DYNAMIC SCENES; GLOBAL ILLUMINATION; GRAPHICS HARDWARE; HIGH FIDELITY; HIGH FIDELITY GRAPHICS; HIGH QUALITY; HUMAN OBSERVERS; HUMAN VISUAL PERCEPTION; INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS; KEY FRAMES; REAL TIME; RENDERED IMAGES; SALIENCY MAP; SELECTIVE RENDERING;

APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES (API); COMPUTER VISION; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33847256264     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Alias wavefront: http://www.aw.sgi.com/.
2. M. R. Bolin and G. W. Meyer. A perceptually based adaptive sampling algorithm. Computer Graphics, 32(Annual Conference Series):299-309, 1998.
3. K. Cater, A. Chalmers, and G. Ward. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. Eurographics Rendering Symposium, (Annual Conference Series), 270-280, 2003.
4. S. Daly. The visible differences predictor: An algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In A. B. Watson, editor, Digital Images and Human Vision, pages 179-206, Cambridge, MA, 1993. MIT Press.
5. E. A. Haines and D. P. Greenberg. The light buffer: a shadow testing accelerator. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 6(9):6-16, 1986.
6. ilab neuromorphic vision c++ toolkit:http://ilab.usc.edu/toolkit/.
7. L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision research, 10(10-12):1489-1506, 2000.
8. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. In Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, volume 20, pages 1254-1259, 1998.
9. M. Kilgard. Creating reflections and shadows using stencil buffers. In GDC 99, 1999.
10. C. Koch and S. Ullman. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. In Human Neurobiology, volume 4, pages 219-227, 1985.
11. M. E. Lee, R. A. Redner, and S. P. Uselton. Statistically optimized sampling for distributed ray tracing. In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pages 61-68. ACM Press, 1985.
12. D. Luebke and B. Hallen. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. Rendering Techniques, 2001.
13. K. Myskowski, T. Tawara, H. Akamine, and H. Seidel. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. SIGGRAPH 2001 Conference Proceedings, pages 221-230, 2001.
14. V. Volevich, K. Myszkowski, A. Khodulev, and E. Kopylov. Measuring and using the visual differences predictor to improve performance of progressive global illumination computation. In Transactions on Graphics, 19:122-161, 2000.
15. G. Ward and R. A. Shakespeare. Rendering with Radiance. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1998.
16. H. Weghorst, G. Hooper, and D. P. Greenberg. Improved computational methods for ray tracing. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, pages 52-69. ACM Press, 1984.
17. A. Yarbus. Eye movements during perception of complex objects. In Eye Movements and Vision, pages 171-196, 1967.
18. H. Yee, S. Pattanaik, and D. P. Greenberg. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, pages 39-65. ACM Press, 2001.