A formal semantics of timed activity diagrams and its PROMELA translation

Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 283-290

  Guelfi, Nicolas ^a   Mammar, Amel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; FORMAL LANGUAGES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SCHEDULING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

PROMELA INPUT LANGUAGE; SPIN MODEL CHECKER; TIMED ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS; TIMING CONSTRAINTS;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 33847255927     PISSN: 15301362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2005.7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. R. Annonier, Formal Translation Rules from Activity Diagrams to Timed Automata, University of Luxembourg, 2004.
2. D.B. Aredo, Semantics of UML Statecharts in PVS, no29, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 2000.
3. E. Dubois, N. Guelfi, Demande de Contribution Financière pour la Réalisation d'un Projet deRecherche: EFFICIENT, Fonds National de la Recherche, Luxembourg-Kirchberg, Luxembourg, 2001.
4. R. Eshuis, Semantics and Verification of UML Activity Diagrams for Workflow Modelling, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, 2002.
5. R. Eshuis, R. Wieringa, Tool Support for Verifying UML Activity Diagrams, vol.30, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Press, pp.437-447, 2004.
6. G. C. Gannod, S. Gupta, An Automated Tool for Analyzing Petri Nets Using SPIN. In proceeding of 16th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE'01).
7. T. Gehrke, U. Goltz, H. Wehrheim: The Dynamic Models of UML: Toward a Semantics and its Application in the Development Process. Hildesheimer Informatik- Bericht 11/98, Institut fur Informatik, Universitat Hildesheimer , 1998.
8. N. Guelfi, A. Mammar, B. Ries, A Formal Approach for the Specification and the Verification of UML Structural Properties: Application to E-Business Domain, International Workshop on Software Verification and Validation (SVV 2004), workshop of ICFEM'04, Seattle, WA, USA, 2004.
9. T. Henzinger, Z. Manna, A. Pnueli, What Good Are Digital Clocks?, Automata, Languages and Programming pp.545-58, 1992.
10. G.J. Holzmann, The Model Checker SPIN, Software Engineering 23(5)pp.279-95, 1997.
11. A. Knapp, S. Merz, C. Rauh, Model Checking Timed UML State Machines and Collaborations, FTRTFT 2002, vol.2469, Oldenburg, Germany., pp.395-414, 2002.
12. Y. Kesten, Z. Manna, A. Pnueli, Verification of clocked and hybrid systems, Acta Informatica 36pp.837-912, 2000.
13. D. Latella, M. Massink, A formal framework for UML Statechart Diagrams Behaviours: From Theory to Automatic Verification, Sixth IEEE International High-Assurance Systems Engineering Symposium, vol.1275, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp.11-22, 2001.
14. J. Lilius, I.P. Paltor, The Semantics of UML State Machines, no273, Turku Centre for Computer Science, 1999.
15. MagicDraw, commercial UML CASE tool, http://www.magicdraw.com/.
16. A. Mammar, N. Guelfi, A Formal Approach for the Verification of E-business Processes Using The Promela Language, SE2C, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 2004.
17. A. Mammar, S. Ramel, B. Grégoire, M. Schmitt, N. Guelfi, "Efficient: A Toolset for Building Trusted B2B Transactions", accepted to the international conference CaiSE'05.
18. NuSMV. http://nusmv.irst.itc.it/.
19. http://theoretica.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de/~pep/.
20. Unified Modeling Language, Object Management Group specification, http://www.omg.org/uml.