Local governments as policy entrepreneurs: Evaluating Florida's "concurrency experiment"

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 505-532

  Chapin, Timothy S ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adequate public facilities; Concurrency; Florida; Growth management; Policy implementation

Indexed keywords

LOCAL GOVERNMENT; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY MAKING; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY; URBAN POLITICS;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847251533     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087406295275     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, L. T. 2000. Planning the built environment. Chicago: Planners Press.
2. Audirac, I., W. O'Dell, and A. Shermyen. 1992. Concurrency management systems in Florida: A catalog and analysis. Bureau of Business and Economic Research, Monograph No. 7. Gainesville, FL.
3. Ben-Zadok, E. 2005. Consistency, concurrency, and compact development: Three faces of growth management implementation in Florida. Urban Studies 42 (12): 2167-2190.
4. Ben-Zadok, E., and D. Gale. 2001. Innovation and reform, intentional inaction, and tactical breakdown: The implementation record of the Florida concurrency policy. Urban Affairs Review 36 (6): 836-871.
5. Chapin, T. Forthcoming. Growth management or growth unabated? Economic development in Florida in the 1990s. In Evaluating Florida's growth management experiment, edited by. T. Chapin, C. Connerly, and H. Higgins. London: Ashgate.
6. Chapin, T., and C. Connerly. 2004. Attitudes towards growth management in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (4): 443-452.
7. Connerly, C., and J. Frank. 1986. Predicting support for local growth controls. Social Sciences Quarterly 67 (3): 572-586.
8. DeGrove, J. 1992. Planning and growth management in the states. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
9. Downs, A. 2003. Why Florida's principles (for controlling new development by regulating road construction) do not and cannot work effectively. Transportation Quarterly 57 (1): 13-18.
10. Ewing, R. 1996. Pedestrian- and transit-friendly design. Prepared for the Florida Administrative Code. 2004. Chapter 9J-5: Minimum criteria for review of local government comprehensive plans.
11. Florida Department of Transportation. 2002. Quality/level of service handbook. Tallahassee: State of Florida.
12. Florida Statutes (chapter 163.3161-3242). 1985. Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act. Tallahassee: State of Florida.
13. Guttenplan, M., B. Davis, R. Steiner, and D. Miller. 2003. Planning level areawide multi-modal level of service (LOS) analysis: Performance measures for congestion management. Transportation Research Record 1858: 61-68.
14. Matland, R. 1995. Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory 5 (2): 145-174.
15. McLaughlin, W. 1987. Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 171-178.
16. Municipal Code Corporation. n.d. http://www.municode.com (accessed on January 31, 2005).
17. Nicholas, J., and R. Steiner. 2000. Growth management and smart growth in Florida. Wake Forest Law Review 35: 645-670.
18. O'Toole, L. 2000. Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory 10 (2): 263-288.
19. Pelham, T. 1992. Adequate public facilities requirements: Reflections on Florida's concurrency system for managing growth. Florida State University Law Review 19: 973-1052.
20. Pelham, T.. 2001. Restructuring Florida's growth management system: Alternative approaches to plan implementation and concurrency. Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 12: 299-310.
21. Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
22. Rosenbloom, S. 1988. Transportation planning. In The practice of local government planning, edited by F. So and J. Getzels, pp. 139-174. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
23. Sabatier, P., and D. Mazmanian. 1980. The implementation of public policy: A framework for analysis. Policy Studies Journal 8: 538-560.
24. Saetren, H. 2005. Facts and myths about research on public policy implementation: Out-of-fashion, allegedly dead, but still very much alive and relevant. The Policy Studies Journal 33 (4): 559-582.
25. Steiner, R. 2001. Florida's transportation concurrency: Are the current tools adequate to meet the need for coordinated land use and transportation planning? Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 12 (2): 269-297.
26. Steiner, R.. Forthcoming. Transportation concurrency: An idea before its time? In Evaluating Florida's growth management experiment, edited by T. Chapin, C. Connerly, and H. Higgins. London: Ashgate.
27. Steiner, R., and J. Waterman. 1999. The impact of concurrency management and the Florida Growth Management Act on transportation investments. Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation, Department of Policy Planning under Contract No. BB- 866, December.
28. Stuart, G. 1994. Concurrency-management practices in Florida: Comparative assessment. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 120 (2): 59-73.
29. Transportation Research Board. 2000. Highway capacity manual. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
30. White, S. M. 1996. Adequate public facilities ordinances and transportation management. Planning Advisory Service Report No. 465. Chicago: American Planning Association.