Using total error as decision criterion in analytical method transfer

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 262-268

  Dewe W ^a   Govaerts, B ^b   Boulanger, B ^a   Rozet, E ^c   Chiap, P ^c   Hubert, Ph ^c  

^a Eli Lilly Benelux   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Analytical method; Consumer risk; Producer risk; Tolerance interval; Total error; Transfer

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; LABORATORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33847246985     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Johnson Y. An FDA Perspective on Method Transfer of Chromatographic Analytical Methods in the Pharmaceutical Industry, The Chromatography Forum of Delaware Valley, October meeting (2004)
2. ISPE. Good Practice Guide: Technology Transfer (2003)
3. Schepers U., and Wätzig H. Application of the equivalence test according to a concept for analytical method transfers from the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE). Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 39 (2005) 310-314
4. Minois-Offroy F., Appriou Y., Brousset V., Chapuzet E., De Fontenay G., Dewe W., Dumas E., Ellie C., Galiay M., Lefebvre N., Mottu P., Quint M.P., and Schoeffter F. Transfert des méthodes analytiques: méthodologie. STP Pharma Pratiques 12 6 (2002) 337-343
5. Kringle R., Khan-Malek R., Snikeris F., Munden P., Agut C., and Bauer M.. A unified approach for design and analysis of transfer studies for analytical methods. Drug Information Journal 35 (2001) 1271-1288
6. Vial J., Jardi A., Anger P., Brun A., and Menet J.M. Methodology for transfer of liquid chromatography methods based on statistical considerations. Journal of Chromatography. A 815 (1998) 173-182
7. ISO 5725 (Part 1 to part 6). Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements methods and results (1994).
8. Hartmann C., Smeyers-Verbeke J., Penninckx W., Vander Heyden Y., Vankeerberghen P., and Masart D. Reappraisal of hypothesis testing for method validation: detection of systematic error by comparing the means of two methods or of two laboratories. Analytical Chemistry 67 24 (1995) 4491-4499
9. Schuirmann D.J. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 15 6 (1987) 657-680
10. Hubert Ph., Nguyen J.J., Boulanger B., Chapuzet E., Chiap P., Cohen N., Compagnon P.A., Dewe W., Feinberg M., Lallier M., Laurentie M., Mercier N., Muzard G., Nivet C., and Valat L. Harmonization of approaches for validation of quantitative analytical procedures: a SFSTP proposal. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 36 (2004) 579-586
11. Hoffman D., and Kringle R. Two-sided tolerance intervals for balanced and unbalanced random effects models. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 15 2 (2005) 283-293
12. Boulanger B., Chiap P., Dewe W., Crommen J., and Hubert Ph. An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progresses and limitations. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 32 (2003) 753-765
13. Mee R.W. β-expectation and β-content tolerance limits for balanced one-way ANOVA random model. Technometrics 26 3 (1984) 251-254
14. Mee R.W. Estimation of the percentage of a normal distribution lying outside a specified interval. Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods 17 5 (1988) 1465-1479
15. Rozet E., Mertens B., Dewe W., Govaerts B., Boulanger B., Chiap P., Streel B., Crommen J., Hubert Ph. The transfer of a LC-UV method for the determination of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid in Lidoses: use of total error as decision criterion. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. In press.