A survey of the use of ultrasound during central venous catheterization

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 104, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 491-497

  Bailey, Peter L ^a,b   Glance, Laurent G ^a   Eaton, Michael P ^a   Parshall, Bob ^a   McIntosh, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b Box 604 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR EMBOLISM; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMATOTHORAX; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PNEUMOTHORAX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE; ULTRASOUND; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS; VEIN EMBOLISM;

CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUGULAR VEINS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAFETY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33847220363     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000255289.78333.c2     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Domino KB, Bowdle TA, Posner KL, et al. Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;100:1411-8.
2. Troianos CA, Jobes DR, Ellison N. Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg 1991;72:823-6.
3. Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy PS. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein. A prospective comparison to the external landmark-guided technique. Circulation 1993;87:1557-62.
4. Gordon AC, Saliken JC, Johns D, et al. US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:333-8.
5. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996;24:2053-8.
6. Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams R, Davidson A, et al. Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Anaesthesia 2004;59:1116-20.
7. Rothschild JM. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 43. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001:245-53.
8. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, et al. Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 2001;i-x, 1-668.
9. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:361.
10. Feller-Kopman D. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: the new standard of care? Crit Care Med 2005;33:1875-7.
11. Calvert N, Hind D, McWilliams RG, et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ultrasound locating devices for central venous access. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002:98.
12. Longo DR, Hewett JE, Ge B, Schubert S. The long road to patient safety: a status report on patient safety systems. JAMA 2005;294:2858-65.
13. Burmeister LF. Principles of successful sample surveys. Anesthesiology 2003;99:1251-2.
14. Leape LL, Berwick DM, Bates DW. What practices will most improve safety? Evidence-based medicine meets patient safety. JAMA 2002;288:501-7.
15. Armstrong PJ, Cullen M, Scott DH. The 'SiteRite' ultrasound machine - an aid to internal jugular vein cannulation. Anaesthesia 1993;48:319-23.
16. Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, et al. Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-61.
17. Augoustides JG, Diaz D, Weiner J, et al. Current practice of internal jugular venous cannulation in a university anesthesia department: influence of operator experience on success of cannulation and arterial injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002;16:567-71.
18. Atkinson P, Boyle A, Robinson S, Campbell-Hewson G. Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterisation in the emergency department? Emerg Med J 2005;22:158-64.
19. Dunning J, Williamson J. Ultrasonic guidance and the complications of central line placement in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2003;20:551-2.
20. Hatfield A, Bodenham A. Portable ultrasound for difficult central venous access. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:822-6.
21. Milling TJ Jr, Rose J, Briggs WM, et al. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: the Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) trial. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1764-9.
22. Hayashi H, Amano M. Does ultrasound imaging before puncture facilitate internal jugular vein cannulation? Prospective randomized comparison with landmark-guided puncture in ventilated patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002;16:572-5.
23. Denys BG, Uretsky BF. Anatomical variations of internal jugular vein location: impact on central venous access. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1516-9.
24. Troianos CA, Kuwik RJ, Pasqual JR, et al. Internal jugular vein and carotid artery anatomic relation as determined by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology 1996;85:43-8.
25. Docktor B, So CB, Saliken JC, Gray RR. Ultrasound monitoring in cannulation of the internal jugular vein: anatomic and technical considerations. Can Assoc Radiol J 1996;47:195-201.
26. Bailey PL, Whitaker EE, Palmer LS, Glance LG. The Accuracy of the central landmark used for central venous catheterization of the internal jugular vein. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1327-32.
27. Schad CA. New guidance criteria for central venous catheters. Radiol Manage 2004;26:44-5.
28. Golden LR. Incidence and management of large-bore introducer sheath puncture of the carotid artery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1995;9:425-8.
29. Neustein SM, Narang J, Bronheim D. Use of the color test for safer internal jugular vein cannulation. Anesthesiology 1992;76:1062.
30. Jobes DR, Schwartz AJ, Greenhow DE, et al. Safer jugular vein cannulation: recognition of arterial puncture and preferential use of the external jugular route. Anesthesiology 1983;59:353-5.
31. Fabian JA, Jesudian MC. A simple method for improving the safety of percutaneous cannulation of the internal jugular vein. Anesth Analg 1985;64:1032-3.
32. Warner DO, Sarr MG, Offord KP, Dale LC. Anesthesiologists, general surgeons, and tobacco interventions in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg 2004;99:1766-73.
33. Seguin R, Godwin M, MacDonald S, McCall M. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys. Can Fam Physician 2004;50:414-9.
34. Lalwani K, Michel M. Pediatric sedation in North Am erican children's hospitals: a survey of anesthesia providers. Paediatr Anaesth 2005;15:209-13.
35. VanDenKerkhof EG, Parlow JL, Goldstein DH, Milne B. In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:449-54.
36. Mavis BE, Brocato JJ. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited. Eval Health Prof 1998;21:395-408.
37. McMahon SR, Iwamoto M, Massoudi MS, et al. Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians. Pediatrics 2003;111:e299-303.
38. Leece P, Bhandari M, Sprague S, et al. Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a randomized comparison (2). J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e30.
39. Braithwaite D, Emery J, De Lusignan S, Sutton S. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract 2003;20:545-51.
40. Warters RD, Szmuk P, Pivalizza EG, et al. The role of anesthesiologists in the selection and administration of perioperative antibiotics: a survey of the Am erican Association of Clinical Directors. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1177-82.