Classification of the lakkasuo peatland ecosystem using remote sensing

4th International Conference on Environmental Informatics, ISEIS 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 295-305

  Huang, Laura Xinglai ^a   Sheng, Grant ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Correct percentage; Kappa values; Peatland classification; Remote sensing; Stratification; Two phase sampling

Indexed keywords

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; REMOTE SENSING; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; TEXTURES; THERMAL STRATIFICATION; WETLANDS;

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; CORRECT PERCENTAGE; KAPPA VALUES; OPTIMAL WINDOW SIZE; PEATLAND; PEATLAND ECOSYSTEMS; REMOTE SENSING DATA; TWO-PHASE SAMPLINGS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33847219815     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Bobbette, R. S. W. & Jeglum, J. K. (1990). Vegetation classification and Landsat-based analysis of peatlands in the Haileybury Clay Plain. Information report Ontario, Forestry, Canada. No. O-X-407.
2. Caldwell, P. J. & Koeln, G. T. (1988). Inventory of wetland resources using Thematic Mapper data from satellites. Water quality bulletin. 13: 1, 26-29.
3. Eurola, S., Hicks, Ss. & Kaakinen, E. (1984). Key to Finnish mire types. European mires. Academic Press, London. p. 11-117.
4. - & Ruuhijarvi, R. (1989). The concept of regionality in Finnish peatlands: A historical perspective up to the 1950s. Suo. 40: 2-3, 87-91.
5. Fitzgerald, R. W. & Lees, B. G. (1994). Assessing the classification accuracy of multisource remote sensing data. Remote sensing of environment. 47: 3, 362-368.
6. th EARSEL Symposium, Espoo, Finland. 27 June - 1 July, 1989.
7. Haralick, R. M., Shanmugan, K. & Dinstein, I. (1973). Textural features for image classification, IEEE trans. On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-3, No. 6. pp. 610-621.
8. Heikurainen, L. (1979). Peatland classification in Finland and its utilization for forestry. In: Classification of peat and peatlands. Int Peat Sco, Helsinki, p. 135-146.
9. - & Pakarinen, P. (1982). Peatland classification. Peatlands and their utilization in Finland. Finn Peatland Soc, Int peat Soc, Finn Comm, Helsinki, p.14-33.
10. Holopainen, M. & Lukkarinen, E. (1994). The use of digital aerial photographs in forest inventory. Summary in English. Helsingin yliopiston metsävarojen käytön laitoksen julkaisuja 4. 33 s.
11. Jaakkola, S. (1987). Satellite remote sensing for forest inventory. An overview of the SNS-project s.21. University of Helsinki, Dept. of Forest Mensuration and Management Research Notes 19.
12. Kalliola, R., Puhakka, M., Salo, J., Tuomisto, H. & Ruokolainen, K. (1991). The dynamics, distribution and classification of swamp vegetation in Peruvian Amazonia. Annales-Botanici-Fennici. 28: 3, 225-239.
13. Laine, J.(1983). Usability of air photo interpretation in drained peatland forest surveys. Suo 34(1): 1-7
14. -Päivänen, J., Schneider, H., & Vasander, H. 1986, Site types at Lakkasuo mire complex. Publications from the department of Peatland Forestry, University of Helsinki.
15. Päivänen, J., Schneider, H., & Vasander, H.(1989). Classification of peatlands drained for forestry. Suo. 40: 1, 37-51.
16. Vasander, H., 1990. Suotyypit. Kirjayhtymä.
17. Lauhanen, R., Pietilainen, P. Saarinen, M. & Heikinen, E. (1995). Usability of infra red imagery in the planning of ditch network maintance. Suo. 46: 1, 21-30.
18. Marceau D. J., Gratton D. J., Fournier, R. A., & Fortin J.-P. (1994). Remote sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 2. The optimal spatial resolution. Remote Sens Eviron. 49: 105-117.
19. Miara, S. (1992). Making an inventory of peat - exploitation areas within the 'Totes Moor' by the analysis of multispectral Landsat 5-TM satellite data. Telma. 22: 145-153.
20. Mikola, P. (1989). Peatlands in Finnish forestry. Suo. 40: 2-3, 71-78.
21. Paavilainen, E. & Tiihonen Paavo (1988). Peatland forests in Finland in 1951 - 1984. Folia Forestalla 714.
22. Päivänen, J. (1995). Peatland Forestry: Ecology and Principles. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
23. Poso, S. (1973). A method of combining photo and field samples in forest inventory. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 76 (1): 1-133.
24. (1988). Seeking for an optimal path for using satellite imageries for forest inventory and monitoring. Proceedings of the IUFRO subject group 4.02.05 meeting in Finland, Aug. 29 - Sept. 2, 1988.
25. Karlsson, M., Pekkonen, T. & Härmä, P. (1990). A system for combining data from remote sensing, maps and field measurements for forest planning purposes. Dept. of Forest Measuration and management, Helsinki University, Research Notes. 23.
26. Päivänen, J. & Vasander H. (1994). Carbon balance in mire ecosystems. World resource review. Vol.6 No.1:102-111.
27. Riley, J. L., Rubec, C. D. A. & Overend, R. P. (1987). The Ontario peatland inventory, 1982-86. Symposium'87 wetlands / peatlands. p. 373-382.
28. Ripley, H. T. & Mawdsley, J. P. A. (1988). An evaluation of Spot imagery for wetland monitoring. SPOT-1 image utilization assessment results. p. 93-97.
29. Starr, M. R. (1986). Forest site classification and evaluation in Finland. IUFRO Workshop for site classification method, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 1985. p. 155-170.
30. Stove, G. C. (1983). The current use of remote sensing data in peat, soil, land-cover and crop inventories in Scotland. philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. 309: 1508, 271-281.
31. Tomppo, E. (1990). Design a satellite image-aided National Forest Survey in Finland. The usability of remote sensing for forest inventory and planning-proceedings from SNS/IUFRO workshop in Umeå 26-28 Feb. 1990.
32. Wang, G. X., Poso, S., Waite, M-L. & Holopainen, M. (1996). Texture analysis module for digital aerial photographs. (to be published in 1996).
33. Wang, G. X. (1996). An expert system for forest resource inventory and monitoring in the frame of multi-source data. University of Helsinki. Department of Forest Resource Management. Publications 10.