Ecological niche conservation and differentiation in the wood-feeding cockroaches, Cryptocercus, in the United States

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 457-466

  Kambhampati, Srinivas ^a   Peterson, A Townsend ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Geographical information system; Niche evolution

Indexed keywords

COCKROACH; COLONIZATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GIS; HABITAT SELECTION; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; NATURAL BARRIER; NICHE;

APPALACHIANS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

BLATTARIA; CRYPTOCERCUS; CRYPTOCERCUS CLEVELANDI; CRYPTOCERCUS DARWINI; CRYPTOCERCUS GARCIAI; CRYPTOCERCUS PUNCTULATUS; CRYPTOCERCUS WRIGHTI;

EID: 33847204049     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00734.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aldrich BT, Kambhampati S, Krafsur E. 2005. Population genetics of wood-feeding cockroaches in the genus Cryptocercus. Journal of Heredity 96: 572-575.
2. Aldrich BT, Krafsur E, Kambhampati S. 2004a. Speciesspecific allozyme markers for wood-feeding cockroaches (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae). Biochemical Genetics 42: 149- 164.
3. Aldrich BT, Zolnerowich G, Kambhampati S. 2004b. Interspecific morphological variation in the wood-feeding cockroach, Cryptocercus (Dictyoptera: Cryptocercidae). Arthropod Structure and Development 33: 443-451.
4. Anderson RP, Laverde M, Peterson AT. 2002. Using nichebased GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice. Oikos 93: 3-16.
5. Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT. 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: Criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecological Modelling 162: 211-232.
6. Burnside CA, Smith PT, Kambhampati S. 1999. Three new species of the wood roach, Cryptocercus (Blattodea: Cryptocercidae), from the eastern United States. Journal of Kansas Entomological Society 72: 361-378.
7. Carpenter G, Gillison AN, Winter J. 1993. DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of animals and plants. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 667- 680.
8. Clark JW, Hossain S, Burnside CA, Kambhampati S. 2001. Coevolution between a cockroach and its bacterial endosymbiont: a biogeographical perspective. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268: 393-398.
9. Clark JW, Kambhampati S. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among Blattabacterium, endosymbiotic bacteria from the wood roach. Cryptocercus Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 82-88.
10. Cleveland L, Hall SR, Sanders EP, Collier J. 1934. The wood-feeding roach Cryptocercus its protozoa and the symbiosis between protozoa and the roach. Memoirs of American Academy of Arts and Sciences 17: 185-342.
11. Elith J, Burgman M. 2002. Predictions and their validation: rare plants in the central highlands, Victoria. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, eds. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 303-314.
12. Hossain S, Kambhampati S. 2001. Phylogeny of Cryptocercus species based on DNA sequence of nuclear ribosomal RNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21: 162-165.
13. Hutchinson GE. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? American Naturalist 93: 145-159.
14. Kambhampati S, Clark JW, Brock BL. 2002. Evolution of host- and habitat association in the wood-feeding cockroach, Cryptocercus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 75: 163-172.
15. Kambhampati S, Luykx P, Nalepa CA. 1996. Evidence for sibling species in the wood roach, Cryptocercus punctuatus, from variation in mitochondrial DNA and karyotype. Heredity 76: 485-496.
16. Levine RS, Peterson AT, Benedict MQ. 2004. Distributions of the Anopheles gambiae complex modeled using a genetic algorithm, with implications for malaria history in Brazil. American Journal of Tropical Medical and Hygiene 70: 105- 109.
17. MacArthur R. 1972. Geographical ecology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
18. Manel S, Dias JM, Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ. 1999a. Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: An illustration with Himalayan river birds. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 734-747.
19. Manel S, Dias JM, Ormerod SJ. 1999b. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks, and logistic regression for predicting species distributions: a case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecological Modelling 120: 337-347.
20. Midgley GF, Hannah L, Millar D, Thuiller W, Booth A. 2003. Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region. Biological Conservation 112: 87-97.
21. Nalepa CA. 2003. Evolution in the genus Cryptocercus: No evidence for differential adaptation in hosts or elevation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 223-233.
22. Peterson AT. 2001. Predicting species' geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. Condor 103: 599- 605.
23. Peterson AT. 2003. Predictability of the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. Quarterly Review of Biology 78: 419-433.
24. Peterson AT, Ball LG, Cohoon KC. 2002a. Predicting distributions of tropical birds. Ibis 144: e27-e32.
25. Peterson AT, Cohoon KC. 1999. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecological Modelling 117: 159-164.
26. Peterson AT, Holt RD. 2003. Niche differentiation in Mexican birds: Using point occurrences to detect ecological innovation. Ecological Letters 6: 774-782.
27. Peterson AT, Kluza DA. 2003. New distributional modeling approaches for gap analysis. Animal Conservation 6: 47-54.
28. Peterson AT, Shaw JJ. 2003. Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Brazil: Ecological niche models, predicted geographic distributions, and climate change effects. International Journal of Parasitology 33: 919-931.
29. Peterson AT, Soberon J, Sanchez-Cordero V. 1999. Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time. Science 285: 1265-1267.
30. Peterson AT, Stockwell DRB, Kluza DA. 2002b. Distributional prediction based on ecological niche modeling of primary occurrence data. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, eds. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 617-623.
31. Peterson AT, Vieglais DA. 2001. Predicting species invasions using ecological niche modeling. Bioscience 51: 363-371.
32. Raxworthy CJ, Martínez-Meyer E, Horning N, Nussbaum RA, Schneider GE, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT. 2003. Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar. Nature 426: 837-841.
33. Soberón J, Peterson AT. 2005. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species' distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2: 1-10.
34. Steinmiller B, Kambhampati S, Brock BL. 2001. Geographic distribution of, and genetic variation in, the wood roach, Cryptocercus (Dictyoptera: Cryptocercidae). Annals of Entomological Society of America 94: 732-742.
35. Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT. 2002a. Controlling bias in biodiversity data. In: Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, eds. Predicting species occurrences: issues of scale and accuracy. Washington D.C.: Island Press, 537-546.
36. Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT. 2002b. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecological Modelling 148: 1-13.
37. Stockwell DRB, Peterson AT. 2003. Comparison of resolution of methods used in mapping biodiversity patterns from point occurrence data. Ecological Indicators 3: 213- 221.