Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device test with laboratory and field performance data

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1970, 2006, Pages 25-44

  Lu, Qing ^a   Harvey, John T ^b   Aschenbrener, Tim ^c   Biel, Tim ^d   VanFrank, Kevin ^d   King, Gayle ^e   Barnes, Scott ^f   Charmot, Stephane ^g   MacKean, Charles ^h   Tahmoressi, Maghsoud ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c State of Colorado   (United States)

^d Box 1482   (United States)

^e GHK Inc ^*  (United States)

^f Montana Department of Transportation   (United States)

^g SemMaterials   (United States)

^h ATSER's Denver Materials Testing Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT; BINDERS; MOISTURE; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE (HWTD); LABORATORY TESTS; MOISTURE SENSITIVITY;

MOTOR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 33847188158     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1970-05     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Equipment Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device. Bituminous Mixtures Laboratory, Asphalt Pavement Technology, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006. www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/labs/mixtures/hamburg. cfm. Accessed July 27, 2005.
2. Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device: Designing Mixtures That Perform. Koch Materials Company, 2006. www.kochpavementsolutions.com/Solutions/hamburg. htm. Accessed July 27, 2005.
3. Aschenbrener, T., R. L. Terrel, and R. A. Zamora. Comparison of the Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device and the Environmental Conditioning System to Pavements of Known Stripping Performance. Report CDOT-DTD-R-94-1. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1994.
4. Rand, D. A. HMA Moisture Sensitivity: Past, Present & Future: TxDOT Experiences. Presented at Moisture Damage Symposium, Western Research Institute, Laramie, Wyoming, 2002. www.westernresearch.org/download/35Rand.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2005.
5. Berger, E., C. L. Monismith, J. Kwong, and J. Nodes. Summary Report: Breakout Session 2: Testing and Treatments. In Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements: A National Seminar, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 293-301.
6. Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel Track Testing of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures. In Materials Manual, Utah Department of Transportation, Nov. 2005, Section 990, Part 8. www.udot.utah.gov/dl.php/tid=644/save/
7. Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Test, Tex-242-F. In Manual of Test Methods, Texas Department of Transportation, Nov. 2004. www.dot.state.tx.us/business/ test%5Fprocedures.htm. Accessed July 27, 2005.
8. Hall, K. D., and S. G. Williams. Acquisition and Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device. Report MBTC FR-1044. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1999.
9. Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
10. Lu, Q. Investigation of Conditions for Moisture Damage in Asphalt Concrete and Appropriate Laboratory Test Methods. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, 2005.
11. Aschenbrener, T., and G. Currier. Influence of Testing Variables on the Results from the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device. Report CDOT-DTD-R-93-22. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1993.
12. Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Testing of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures. Colorado Procedure L-5112. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 2002.
13. King, G. N., S. W. Bishara, and G. Fager. Acid/Base Chemistry for Asphalt Modification. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 71, 2002.
14. Bishara, S., G. N. King., D. Mahoney, and R. L. McReynolds. Modification of Binder with Acid: Advantages and Disadvantages. Report FHWA-KS-02-2. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
15. Aschenbrener, T. Influence of Refining Processes and Crude Oil Sources Used in Colorado on Results from the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device. Research Report CDOT-DTD-R-94-7. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, April 1994.
16. Lu, Q., and J. Harvey. Evaluation of Moisture Sensitivity of Hot-Mix Asphalt by Flexural Beam Fatigue Test. In Asphalt Concrete: Simulation, Modeling, and Experimental Characterization, Geotechnical Special Publication 146, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 2006.
17. Santucci, L. Performance Graded (PG) Asphalts in California. Technical Topics, No. 6. Technology Transfer Program, Pavement Research Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2005.