Is selectively harvested forest an ecological trap for Olive-sided Flycatchers?

Condor

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 109-121

  Robertson, Bruch A ^a   Hutto, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological trap; Evolutionary trap; Habitat preference; Olive sided Flycatcher; Selective harvest; Timber management; Wildfire

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; CONTOPUS COOPERI;

EID: 33847184910     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2007)109[109:ISHFAE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AEBISCHER, A., N. PERRIN, M. KRIEG, J. STUDER, AND D. R. MEYER. 1996. The role of territory choice, mate choice and arrival date on breeding success in the Savi's Warbler Locustella luscibioides. Journal of Avian Biology 27:143-152.
2. AKAIKE, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, p. 267-281. In B. Petran and F. Csaki [EDS.], International symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
3. ALTMAN, B., AND R. SALLABANKS. 2000. Olive-sided Flycatcher (Contopus cooperi). In A. Poole and F. Gill [EDS.], The birds of North America, No. 502. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
4. ANDERSON, D. R., K. P. BURNHAM, AND W. L. THOMPSON. 2000. Null hypothesis testing: problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:912-923.
5. ARNO, S. F., AND C. E. FIEDLER. 2005. Mimicking nature's fire: restoring fire-prone forests in the West. Island Press, Washington, DC.
6. BENSCH, S., AND D. HASSELQUIST. 1991. Territory infidelity in the polygynous Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus: the effect of variation in territory attractiveness. Journal of Animal Ecology 60:857-871.
7. BLANCHER, P. J., AND R. J. ROBERTSON. 1987. Effect of food supply on the breeding biology of Western Kingbirds. Ecology 68:723-732.
8. BRANDY, P. M. 2001. A hierarchical analysis of Olive-sided Flycatcher habitat use in a managed landscape. M.Sc. thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA.
9. BURNHAM, K. P., AND D. R. ANDERSON. 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
10. BURNHAM, K. P., AND D. R. ANDERSON. 2001. Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies. Wildlife Research 28:111-119.
11. CARO, T. 1998. The significance of behavioral ecology for conservation biology, p. 3-26. In T. Caro [ED.], Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, New York.
12. CLARK, R. G., AND D. SHUTLER. 1999. Avian habitat selection: pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology 80:272-287.
13. CURRIE, D., D. B. THOMPSON, AND T. BURKE. 2000. Patterns of territory settlement and consequences for breeding success in the Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe. Ibis 142:389-398.
14. DELIBES, M., P. GAONA, AND P. FERRERAS. 2001. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. American Naturalist 158:277-285.
15. DELONG, S. C., AND D. TANNER. 1996. Managing the pattern of forest harvest: lessons from wildfire. Biodiversity and Conservation 5:1191-1205.
16. DONOVAN, T. M., AND F. R. THOMPSON III. 2001. Modeling the ecological trap hypothesis: a habitat and demographic analysis for migrant songbirds. Ecological Applications 11:871-882.
17. DWERNYCHUK, L. W., AND D. A. BOAG. 1972. Ducks nesting in association with gulls-an ecological trap? Canadian Journal of Zoology 50:559-563.
18. FITZPATRICK, J. W. 1981. Search strategies of tyrant flycatchers. Animal Behavior 29:810-821.
19. FRANSSON, T., AND S. JAKOBSSON. 1998. Fat storage in male Willow Warblers in spring: do residents arrive lean or fat? Auk 115:759-763.
20. FROST, C. C. 1998. Presettlement fire frequency regimes of the United States: a first approximation, p. 70-81. In T. Pruden and L. Brennan [EDS.], Fire in ecosystem management: shifting the paradigm from suppression to prescription. Tall Timbers fire ecology conference proceedings No. 20. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahasee, FL.
21. HABECK, J. R., AND R. W. MUTCH. 1973. Fire-dependent forests in the northern Rocky Mountains. Quaternary Research 3:408-424.
22. HEJL, S. J., R. L. HUTTO, C. R. PRESTON, AND D. M. FINCH. 1995. Effects of silvicultural treatments in the Rocky Mountains, p. 220-244. In T. E. Martin and D. M. Finch [EDS.], Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds: a synthesis and review of critical issues. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. HOLLING, C. S. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 45:1-60.
24. HOLLING, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 48:1-86.
25. HOSMER, D. W., JR, AND S. LEMESHOW. 1989. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
26. HUTTO, R. L. 1985. Habitat selection by nonbreeding migratory land birds, p. 455-476. In M. Cody [ED.], Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, London.
27. HUTTO, R. L. 1990. Measuring the availability of food resources. Studies in Avian Biology 13:20-28.
28. HUTTO, R. L. 1995. Composition of bird communities following stand-replacement fires in northern Rocky Mountain (U.S.A.) conifer forests. Conservation Biology 9:1041-1058.
29. HUTTO, R. L., AND J. S. YOUNG. 1999. Habitat relationships of landbirds in the Northern Region. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-32.
30. KOKKO, H. 1999. Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 68:940-950.
31. KOKKO, H., AND W. J. SUTHERLAND. 2001. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evolutionary Ecology Research 3:537-551.
32. LACK, D., AND E. LACK. 1951. The breeding biology of the swift Apus apus. Ibis 93:501-546.
33. LEVINS, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. MARTIN, T. E., J. SCOTT, AND C. MENGES. 2000. Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 267:2287-2293.
35. MEEHAN, T. D., AND T. L. GEORGE. 2003. Short-term effects of moderate- to high-severity wildfire on a disturbance-dependent flycatcher in northwest California. Auk 120:1102-1113.
36. MISENHELTER, M. D., AND J. ROTENBERRY. 2000. Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in Sage Sparrows. Ecology 81:2892-2901.
37. PEREYRA, M. E., AND M. L. MORTON. 2001. Nestling growth and thermoregulatory development in subalpine Dusky Flycatchers. Auk 118:116-136.
38. RALPH, C. J., G. R. GEUPEL, P. PYLE, T. E. MARTIN, AND D. F. DESANTE. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144.
39. REEVE, H. K., AND P. W. SHERMAN. 1993. Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research. Quarterly Review of Biology 68:1-32.
40. RICKLEFS, R. E. 1976. Growth rate of birds in the humid New World tropics. Ibis 118:176-207.
41. ROBERTSON, B. A., AND R. L. HUTTO. 2006. A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075-1085.
42. SAS INSTITUTE. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
43. SCHLAEPFER, M. A., M. C. RUNGE, AND P. W. SHERMAN. 2002. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:474-480.
44. SHAFFER, T. L. 2004. A unified approach to analyzing nest success. Auk 121:526-540.
45. SHANNON, C. E., AND W. WEAVER. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
46. SHOCHAT, E., M. A. PATTEN, D. W. MORRIS, D. L. REINKING, D. H. WOLFE, AND S. K. SHERROD. 2005. Ecological traps in isodars: effects of tallgrass prairie management on bird nest success. Oikos 111:159-169.
47. SHORT, K. C., AND J. F. NEGRÓN. 2003. Arthropod responses: a functional approach, p. 286-305. In P. Friederici [ED.], Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Island Press, Washington, DC.
48. SKUTCH, A. F. 1949. Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis 91:430-455.
49. SMUCKER, K. M., R. L. HUTTO, AND B. M. STEELE. 2005. Changes in bird abundance after wildfire: importance of fire severity and time since fire. Ecological Applications 15:1535-1549.
50. SPIES, T. A., W. J. RIPPLE, AND G. A. BRADSHAW. 1994. Dynamics and pattern of a managed coniferous forest landscape in Oregon. Ecological Applications 4:555-568.
51. STUART-SMITH, K. A., AND J. P. HAYES. 2003. Influence of residual tree density on predation of artificial and natural songbird nests. Forest Ecology and Management 183:159-176.
52. TINBERGEN, N. 1951. The study of instinct. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
53. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. 2002. Fire monitoring handbook. National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, ID.
54. VAN RIPER, C., III. 1984. The influence of nectar resources on nesting success and movement patterns of the Common Amakihi. Auk 101: 38-46.
55. WALSBERG, G. E. 1978. Brood size and the use of time and energy by the Phainopepla. Ecology 59:147-153.
56. WELDON, A. J., AND N. M. HADDAD. 2005. The effects of patch shape on Indigo Buntings: evidence for an ecological trap. Ecology 86:1422-1431.