Headache patients in routine clinical practice. When are additional instrumental examinations indicated?;Kopfschmerzpatienten im klinischen alltag. Wann ist eine apparative zusatzuntersuchung indiziert?

Schmerz

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 43-48

  May, A ^a   Diener, H C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anomalies; Diagnosis; Electrophysiology; Headache; Imaging

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; MIGRAINE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIMARY HEADACHE; REVIEW; SECONDARY HEADACHE; TENSION HEADACHE; TRIGEMINAL AUTONOMIC CEPHALALGIA;

BRAIN; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEADACHE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIGRAINE DISORDERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33847183152     PISSN: 0932433X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00482-006-0498-z     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. American Academy of Neurology (AAN) (1994) Practice parameter: the utility of neuroimaging in the evaluation of headache in patients with normal neurologic examinations (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 44(7): 1353-1354
2. De Carlo L, Cavaliere B, Arnaldi C et al. (1999) EEG evaluation in children and adolescents with chronic headaches. Eur J Pediatr 158(3): 247-248
3. Frishberg B, Rosenberg J, Matchar D et al. (2002) Evidence-based guidelines in the primary care setting: neuroimaging in patients with nonacute headache. http://www.aan.com/professionals/practice/guideline/index.cfm
4. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2004) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edn. Cephalalgia 24 [Suppl 1]: 1-160
5. Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ (1999) Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA 282(1): 36-39
6. Kramer U, Nevo Y, Neufeld MY, Harel S (1994) The value of EEG in children with chronic headaches. Brain Dev 16(4): 304-308
7. May A, Straube A, Peikert A, Diener H (2005) Diagnostik und apparative Zusatzuntersuchungen bei Kopfschmerzen. In: Diener H (Hrsg) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie, 3. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart, S 476-479
8. Messori A, Polonara G, Mabiglia C, Salvolini U (2003) Is haemosiderin visible indefinitely on gradient-echo MRI following traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage? Neuroradiology 45(12): 881-886
9. Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen P, Welch K (1999) The Headaches, 2nd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
10. Russell MB, Olesen J (1996) A nosographic analysis of the migraine aura in a general population. Brain 119: 355-361
11. Sandrini G, Friberg L, Janig W et al. (2004) Neurophysiological tests and neuroimaging procedures in non-acute headache: guidelines and recommendations. Eur J Neurol 11(4): 217-224
12. Scholten-Peeters GG, Verhagen AP, Bekkering GE et al. (2003) Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain 104(1-2): 303-322
13. Wang HZ, Simonson TM, Greco WR, Yuh WT (2001) Brain MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic headache in patients without other neurologic symptoms. Acad Radiol 8(5): 405-408
14. Wardlaw JM, Statham PF (2000) How often is haemosiderin not visible on routine MRI following traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage? Neuroradiology 42(2): 81-84