Structural change and Thailand energy demand

International Journal of Energy Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 300-314

  Buranakunaporn, Suthep ^a   Oczkowski, Edward ^b  

^a RAMKHAMHAENG UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Energy demand; Structural change; Thailand

Indexed keywords

ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ERROR CORRECTION; ESTIMATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ECONOMIC POLICY; ENERGY DEMAND; STRUCTURAL CHANGE; THAILAND;

ENERGY POLICY;

ENERGY MANAGEMENT; ENERGY POLICY; ERROR CORRECTION; ESTIMATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTEGRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33847168197     PISSN: 0363907X     EISSN: 1099114X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/er.1234     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Asafu-Adjaye J. 2000. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics 22:615-625.
2. Atkinson J, Manning N. 1995. A survey of international energy elasticities. In Global Warming and Energy Demand, Barker T, Ekins P, Johnstone N (eds). Routledge: London.
3. Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM. 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 37:149-192.
4. Christiano LJ. 1992. Searching for a break in GNP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10(3):237-250.
5. Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1979. Distribution of estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of American Statistical Association 84:427-431.
6. Dickey DA, Fuller WA. 1981. Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49:1057-1072.
7. Engle RF, Granger CWJ. 1987. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251-276.
8. Gregory AW, Hansen BE. 1996. Residual based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts. Journal of Econometrics 70(1):99-126.
9. Harris RID. 1995. Using Cointegration Analysis in Econometric Modelling. Prentice Hall: New York.
10. Harvey AC. 1981. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series. Philip Alan: Oxford.
11. Hoa TV. 1993. Effects of oil on output growth and inflation in developing countries: the case of Thailand from January 1966 to January 1991. International Journal of Energy Research 17(1):29-33.
12. Johansen S, Juselius K. 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application of demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52:169-209.
13. Masih AMM, Masih R. 1996. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelling techniques. Energy Economics 18:165-183.
14. Newey WK, West KD. 1987. A simple positive semi-definite heteroscadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:1029-1054.
15. Ng S, Perron P. 1995. Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90:268-281.
16. Oh W, Lee K. 2004. Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP revisited: the case of Korea 1970-1999. Energy Economics 26:55-59.
17. Osterwald-Lenum M. 1992. A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54(3):461-472.
18. Perron P. 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6):1361-1401.
19. Phillips PCB, Perron P. 1988. Testing for a unit root in time-series regression. Biometrica 75:335-346.
20. Zivot E, Andrews DWK. 1992. Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10(3):251-270.