Managing deceitful reports with the transferable belief model

2005 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, FUSION

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 893-899

  Smets, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Belief function negation; Deceiver; Lying sensor; TBM

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRA; FUNCTION EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SENSOR DATA FUSION;

BELIEF FUNCTION NEGATION; DECEIVERS; LYING SENSORS; TRANSFERABLE BELIEF MODEL (TBM);

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY);

EID: 33847166315     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICIF.2005.1591953     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. B. Ristic and Ph. Smets. A solution to the data association problem for the tbm based classification of multiple objects. Int. J. Information Fusion, forthcoming, 2005.
2. G. Shafer. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, NJ, 1976.
3. Ph. Smets and R. Kennes. The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence, 66:191-234, 1994.
4. Ph. Smets and R. Kruse. The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In A. Motro and Ph. Smets, editors, Uncertainty Management in Information Systems: from Needs to Solutions, pages 343-368. Kluwer, Boston, MA., 1997.
5. Ph. Smets. The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation. In D. M. Gabbay and Ph. Smets, editors, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, volume 1, pages 267-301. Kluwer, Doordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998.
6. Ph. Smets. Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. In M. Henrion, R. D. Shachter, L. N. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, editors, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5, pages 29-40. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
7. Ph. Smets. Decision making in a context where uncertainty is represented by belief functions. In R. P. Srivastava and T.J. Mock, editors, Belief Functions in Business Decisions, pages 17-61. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2002.
8. Ph. Smets. Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning, 38:133-147, 2005.
9. D. Dubois and H. Prade. A set-theoretic view of belief functions: logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems, 12:193-226, 1986.
10. Ph. Smets. The alpha-junctions: combination operators applicable to belief functions. In D.M Gabbay, R. Kruse, A. Nonnengart, and H.J. Ohlbach, editors, Qualitative and quantitative practical reasoning, pages 131-153. Springer, 1997.
11. J Lowrance and T. Garvey. Evidential reasoning: an implementation for multisensor integration. Technical Report 307, SRI International, 1983.
12. J. Schubert. On nonspecific evidence. Int. J. Intell. Syst., 8(6):711-725, 1993.
13. T. Denoeux and M.-H. Masson. Evclus: evidential clustering of proximity data. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics: B, 34:95-109, 2004.
14. Ph. Smets. Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions, submitted, 2004.